WDDM Forum : Proposals and Initiatives

Any member can post here proposals concerning WDDM (its function, mission, goals, organization). 
Goto: Forum ListMessage List• New Topic • Search • Log In
Re: DD Constitutions
Posted by: BrEggum (IP Logged)
Date: April 25, 2008 12:08PM

Dear Roy,

You seem to have missed the point. I am generally against super majority decisions. It may be requested on specific issues but not by default.
You say a certain level of trust is necessary regarding representatives, that trust is also necessary for the people. If a rep does not show up for a vote, likely I don't want that person voting. Same with people. If the person does not show up to vote, I don't want their vote as it indicates they are to absorbed to cast their decision.

Those of us who do vote, like you and I have likely considered the matter and the majority of us who vote are likely to make good decisions. By maintaining the 50% + 1 we can also change a decision easily. If you make things to tight, people will not be involved.

Keep your site up Roy, times are changing for the better. Slow but sure.


Bruce Eggum Wisconsin USA

Options: Reply To This Message • Quote This Message
Navigate: Previous MessageNext Message

Subject Views Written By Posted
  DD Constitutions 1596 RoyDaine 03/11/2008 02:52AM
  Re: DD Constitutions 894 MiKolar 03/28/2008 08:35PM
  Re: DD Constitutions 935 RoyDaine 04/04/2008 07:35AM
  Re: DD Constitutions 849 PVR 04/05/2008 10:47PM
  Re: DD Constitutions 906 RoyDaine 04/07/2008 02:36AM
  Re: DD Constitutions 921 PVR 04/07/2008 08:23PM
  Re: DD Constitutions 824 BrEggum 04/24/2008 11:41AM
  Re: DD Constitutions 966 RoyDaine 04/25/2008 06:02AM
  Re: DD Constitutions 888 BrEggum 04/25/2008 12:08PM
  Re: DD Constitutions 853 RoyDaine 04/25/2008 12:59PM
  Re: DD Constitutions 860 BrEggum 04/25/2008 02:46PM
  Re: DD Constitutions 852 RoyDaine 06/18/2008 07:53AM
  Re: DD Constitutions 907 PVR 03/17/2008 10:22PM

Get Firefox!       Powered by Phorum.       PHP