Bernard Clayson WDDM Home Page
My site: http://www.planet-thanet.fsnet.co.uk∞
Options for the WDDM structure∞
We do not need the 'many rules'.
'Many roads lead to democracy', WDDM can not/should not presume an
'only way', example - I support the principle of I&R, yet I do not
support the I&R that is most used.
WDDM must be open to originality.
How do we get, or get people to be, active rather than indulge in rhetoric
for the sake of 'debate'?
I threw a direct challenge to the political system by doing a public run
referendum and publishing the results in the press and to the Chief Exec,
the leader of the District Council, and to electoral services.
I backed it up by asking international contacts to email the CE and Leader
(with copies to the press) congratulating them on supporting/doing the
The after effects are still to be realised because the press did not
understand the implications of what I had done, I am in the slow process of
Only the CE and electoral services would understand most of the implications
because I challenged them over the election process when I stood for
Most of the saga is here: