Aahahahah!!!!!!!!!
Welcome to the real world!!
To think that you, as an intellectual elite can set the agenda on anything of actual consequence is foolish.
Who are you?
This agenda setting job... who gave it to you? Why am I not using WDDM correctly? Why am I not staying up to date? Why do I get bored every time I try to figure out how WDDM works even though I am passionate about DD? Why is WDDM not more appealing to even me?
Something is wrong with this picture, gentlemen. Your approach is flawed. Your little elitist club has shown no concern towards promoting Direct Democracy and engaging people. This is not just a problem, this flaws your raison d'etre. It confirms my worst suspicions, ahahahahah.....
You claim to have an interest in this concept but you keep acting
from an intrinsic assumption of hierarchy, trying to lead, set the agenda, talk people down on their ability to think and READ. Who the hell are you to tell me I am off subject, sir? You are off subject... and wasting our time.
You don't realize how incoherent your methodology and approach is in terms of the cause and principles you claim to hold dear.
Keep your little debate, your little group, your little righteousness. WDDM has no voice... not one that reaches further than your computer screen. But that doesn't matter to you, so long as your intellectual ego feels vindicated.
If you don't get the people on board, DD will never happen.
I am actually interested in DD and feel most unwelcome by you clowns so... imagine if I wasn't interested, like the majority of people.
That's what you are dealing with, if you areserious about DD. How to win people over. Debate that,
Gentlemen.... may you all a fruitful and meaningful
life
From: Giorgio Menon <giorgio.menon(at)pd.infn.it>
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Sent: Tue, 26 October, 2010 9:54:36
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Direct Democracy
Il 26/10/2010 11.52, Georges Metanomski ha scritto:
>
> So far, Metanomski show that we not only ignore what's "debate', but don't
>
> know how to read. Seems hopeless.
>
>
>
Couldn't agree more