George Kokkas,
it is 7 (seven) years after Delphi, that you (and alike members of
alike
groups) agree on the substantially same principles, FDs, DD
regulations,
charts. What are the results, so late? Eventually, why none?
antonio
George Kokkas's Law Office ha scritto:
I agree with Bruce.
George Kokkas
-----
Original Message -----
To:
wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Sent:
Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:48 AM
Subject:
Re: [WDDM] Proposal
If the voter has one choice and disagrees, the blank vote would not
show the voter disagrees. It would only show non-participation,
no-interest, un-decided etc.
I suggest should be a blank for REJECT or such to show not wanting the
person or issue confirmed.
Bruce
On 6/4/07, M. Kolar
wrote:
On
course, blank vote is there. You simple leave all fields blank (no
check), or all fields blank (or mark with an N) in a range vote.
And you can at the same time nominate your alternative candidates.
Mirek
Nicolas Durand wrote:
> Well, there are 3 things:
>
> a) people not interested by the matter — they leave it up to the
> majority — it's their choice (just as Bruce just said)
>
> b) people not able to vote because in vacation or so — this is why
we
> need to give enough time
>
> c) Blank vote — I did not see this option on this referendum. I
find
> important to be able to vote blank, saying "None of these options
suit
> me. Please rephrase" (=please give me other candidates in an
election).
>
> I am a very strong supporter of the blank vote. I think that it
needs
> to be added to every poll and election, and be treated as another
> candidate or option, meaning that if more people vote blank than
for a
> candidate or an option, things must be re-shuffled.
>
> Nico
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Bruce Eggum
Gresham Wisconsin, USA
http://www.doinggovernment.com/
Check out my Blog too
http://bruceeggum.blogster.com/
|