I agree with Bruce.
George Kokkas
----- Original Message -----
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 12:48
AM
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Proposal If the voter has one choice and disagrees, the blank vote would
not show the voter disagrees. It would only show non-participation,
no-interest, un-decided etc.
I suggest should be a blank for
REJECT or such to show not wanting the person or issue confirmed.
Bruce
On 6/4/07, M. Kolar
wrote:
On
course, blank vote is there. You simple leave all fields blank
(no check), or all fields blank (or mark with an N) in a range
vote. And you can at the same time nominate your alternative
candidates. Mirek
Nicolas Durand wrote:
> Well, there
are 3 things: > > a) people not interested by the matter – they
leave it up to the > majority – it's their choice (just as Bruce just
said) > > b) people not able to vote because in vacation or so –
this is why we > need to give enough time > > c) Blank
vote – I did not see this option on this referendum. I find >
important to be able to vote blank, saying "None of these options
suit > me. Please rephrase" (=please give me other candidates in an
election). > > I am a very strong supporter of the blank vote.
I think that it needs > to be added to every poll and election, and be
treated as another > candidate or option, meaning that if more people
vote blank than for a > candidate or an option, things must be
re-shuffled. > > Nico > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Bruce Eggum Gresham Wisconsin, USA, www.doinggovernment.com; Check out my Blog too: bruceeggum.blogster.com
|