| From: | "Bruce Eggum" <bruce.eggum(at)gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 27 Feb 2007 05:13:52 -0600 |
| Subject: | Re: [WDDM] Re to Mirek and Mr Khan: [WDDM] Re: WDDM Membership Requirement |
Filia,
That's a misunderstanding.
Mr. Khan fulfilled the requirement of providing enough personal
democracy-related information more than enough, see all the information he
provided about himself: http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/SAK
I just have a personal issue with him that his proposed system is not a Direct
Democracy.
It was the most recent member that has not provided anything, even after two
reminders: http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/MikhailKozyrev
My query and Mark Antell's reply referred to this case.
Mirek
Filia den Hollander wrote:
> Hi Mirek,
>
> Sorry that I didn't reply. I can see both arguments for as well as
> against more precise rules for those who wish to participate in WDDM,
> so I'm neutral on this one.
>
> However, I would argue to mr Khan that if he's not willing to give an
> answer to questions that are asked more than once - "please state your
> engagement with WDDM" -, i.e. that if he's not prepared to respect
> simple politeness rules, he might as well leave this forum.
>
> I believe it is reasonable (and has to do with the need to self protect
> rather than politics) that people who show no respect nor effort are
> chucked out.
>
>
> With kind regards,
> Filia den Hollander