[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

01011: Re: [WDDM] Re to Mirek and Mr Khan: [WDDM] Re: WDDM Membership Requirement

From: "M. Kolar" <wddm(at)mkolar.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 03:09:17 -0800
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Re to Mirek and Mr Khan: [WDDM] Re: WDDM Membership Requirement

Filia,
That's a misunderstanding.
Mr. Khan fulfilled the requirement of providing enough personal
democracy-related information more than enough, see all the information he
provided about himself: http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/SAK
I just have a personal issue with him that his proposed system is not a Direct
Democracy.

It was the most recent member that has not provided anything, even after two
reminders: http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/MikhailKozyrev
My query and Mark Antell's reply referred to this case.

Mirek


Filia den Hollander wrote:

Hi Mirek,

Sorry that I didn't reply. I can see both arguments for as well as
against more precise rules for those who wish to participate in WDDM,
so I'm neutral on this one.

However, I would argue to mr Khan that if he's not willing to give an
answer to questions that are asked more than once - "please state your
engagement with WDDM" -, i.e. that if he's not prepared to respect
simple politeness rules, he might as well leave this forum.

I believe it is reasonable (and has to do with the need to self protect
rather than politics) that people who show no respect nor effort are
chucked out.


With kind regards,
Filia den Hollander


[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]