M. Kolar
wrote: S'ace, although I have been trying hard all the time to understand
your posts,
I must confess that I can still dig
up very little understandable information from your "encoded"
messages.
A: For
example,
does what you write below mean that
you do not believe any more in what you wrote in that Wiki page cited
below?
B: Can you please try to write in a
more plain language so that everybody can make some sense from it in a
relatively short time?
Thanks, Mirek
Dear Mirek,
as i stated or rather state right now
...
i was surprised by your comments in the
GBM link you visited, half a year ago ...
i experience that awakening process on
this planet go real fast ... (do you copy that phenomenon?
Y/N?)
so it seems not sensible to cling on to
all historic moments in a fastgoing process ...
at least not now ... while we are right
in that process ...
later we can make time to see and
analyze what happened ...
got this picture? where i tried to think
on Question A.
For B i now (the fast ongoing process of
creations edge on the horsemove?) formulate this
answer:
- may it be clear that i cannot guarantee everybody to make
some sense from it ... this is where what i "produce" can be offered by me but
not consumed, say consu-mediated. maybe this is where i need catalysers as mr.
antonio rossin and mr. jan gieszen who about a year ago co-wrote an election-bug article
with a european fellow (me, richme poorme). it was a nice mission
"possible" by ignoring the "impossible option".
- having said this, i can now state that
i can respond willingly on the call for a try :: i really try to do the best i
can - will you belief me?
- in order to create a workable energized
space where we can communicate ... this mechanistic thing (pc) and the
internet need to be "catalyzed" also to a humanistic affair :: here i use the
work of mr. peter jones &
hodges model.
- a practical thing i will perform on
life shows is a short meditation - which i developed and labelled: the
electric neu-ree-bah ... Which on this medium and in this dialogue may
complexify , however is meant as "a thing called love"(johnny cash) . And my italian friend
can talk in an article on what that thing does to the neurosystem that can
be managed by every human (if ...). Mr. Jan Gieszen, the other
co-writer, is also skilled
in this market.
- to uncomplexify i herewith deliver a
doc-ument(al) that at first page overwhelms at first sight, but can be of use
at another moment, if that moment and time is prepared for the energy needed
to get into the (deep?) understanding mode.
- the second page is of more
shirt use, i think, in the effort of me to catalyse the communication GAP
...
- and lets be open ... we will not close
the gap in one step ... sure i'll be happy if it happens, but we have to be
careful in "a schedule" ...
- on a term of a month, after the indian
experience, i may have i touchdown momentum that facilitates an even more
article as a communication with us, within a relatively short time
(considering 5 years? 13 years? over 100 years? of practising
one-man-one-vote "destruction of ..." (what can i tell for "..."? May everyone
have its own words from a spectating level for that 3
dots?
Neu Ree Bah ;-)
S'ace
even more attracted by acting the self
than talking on ... s'11 :{
|