From: | "Jiri Polak" <jiri.polak(at)swipnet.se> |
---|---|
Date: | Mon, 23 May 2005 16:10:54 +0200 |
Subject: | Re: various (lozenge etc.) |
Jiri Polak wrote:
Hello,
I agree with Mirek. In the future, fully developed democratic systems,
there will not be any need to have leaders (but there will always be
necessary to have some structures ensuring the running og the system). We
are not there yet.
Ancient Greeks called it Ou-Topos (Non-Place). It's commonly known as
Utopia now.
At this stage, when we are barely beginning to discuss truly democratic
systems and attempt, by trial and error, to put in place some rudimentary
mechanisms, leaders ARE needed! Current DD leaders do not get payed, they
do what they do because of deep conviction and concern about the future
of mankind.
A simple question: does mankind need their concerns? Does manking need
other Savyors who, in their name, rescue them from a life of misery? Or
isn't more commonly practiced the role of he-who-needs-to
show-how-miserable-mankind-is? A miserable mankind will never show
adequate responsability, rather a great need for authorities. Here the
circle closes.
Nothing personal, of course. I appreciate all the time and energies these
individuals spend in order to improve our lives. I'm only asking if our
lives need it.
Am i exaggerating maybe? I remember that an exaggerated love begets
hartred......
Therefore, there is no corruption and no reason to distrust this type of
leadership. We should be grateful to all those who assume a (temporary)
role as leaders in certain areas.
Sincerely, Jiri Polak
Absolutely. But Masters of all kinds and all ages MUST be abandoned to be
able to achieve personal independance (freedom?), thus a "fully developed
democratic systems", whatever this means.
Best regards
Giorgio