From: | "Jiri Polak" <jiri.polak(at)swipnet.se> |
---|---|
Date: | Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:11:44 +0100 |
Subject: | Re: [WDDM] Re: Aprove a new member |
I received 4 votes by e-mail on Mr. Khan's membership.
After I added my vote (which is NO; see for reasons e.g.
http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/forum/read.php?15,381,384#msg-384),
the total is:
YES - 2 votes
NO - 2 votes
MAYBE - 1 vote
According to the rules proposed in April 2005
(http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/WddmRules) we should postpone
the decision in such case until a better consensus is achieved.
These rules were however never really implemented and it seemed in the
past that the consensus was to accept anybody who claimed to be a DD
advocate and registered with us. So Mr. Khan remains and he is now also
subscribed to both lists.
I called a vote on this case because Mr. Khan's membership seemed to me to
be in contradiction to our mission as currently written on the WDDM home
page.
That's why I think it is time to clarify the character of WDDM as I
suggested in my previous post and then maybe derive from it some very
basic rules and enforce them.
Mirek