Re: [WDDM] Re: Aprove a new member

[Giorgio Menon <giorgio.menon(at)pd.infn.it>]

Dear Mirek,
I think that a subscription to OpenWDDM can be the easy solution to this
problem. As far as i'm concerned i'm favourable to Mr Khan membership,
as long as we decide his partecipation makes sense.
Regards
Giorgio

WDDM webmaster wrote:

> I received 4 votes by e-mail on Mr. Khan's membership.
> After I added my vote (which is NO; see for reasons e.g.
> http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/forum/read.php?15,381,384#msg-384),
> the total is:
> YES - 2 votes
> NO - 2 votes
> MAYBE - 1 vote
>
> According to the rules proposed in April 2005
> (http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/WddmRules) we should
> postpone the decision in such case until a better consensus is achieved.
> These rules were however never really implemented and it seemed in the
> past that the consensus was to accept anybody who claimed to be a DD
> advocate and registered with us. So Mr. Khan remains and he is now
> also subscribed to both lists.
>
> I called a vote on this case because Mr. Khan's membership seemed to
> me to be in contradiction to our mission as currently written on the
> WDDM home page.
> That's why I think it is time to clarify the character of WDDM as I
> suggested in my previous post and then maybe derive from it some very
> basic rules and enforce them.
>
> Mirek