From: | Hamid Mohseni <esi1mohseni2(at)hotmail.com> |
---|---|
Date: | Mon, 25 Oct 2010 06:05:41 +0000 |
Subject: | RE: [WDDM] Chocolate minarets and Multikulti (for Mirek) |
I agree with you. Therefore I have written and urged all political parties in Sweden to change the political system to direct democracy. I have written to them that I don´t recognize these parties as my representants and leaders and it is unlaufull to represent others without authorization. I am continuing my discussion with these parties and have made some progress in this way. Regards Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:13:05 +0100 From: latalondon(at)yahoo.co.uk To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net Subject: Re: [WDDM] Chocolate minarets and Multikulti (for Mirek) What has any of this got to do with trying to advance the cause of a better and more direct democracy?
Wake up people. Our egos want to show off our knowledge. We want to be right, win some kind of argument... Even these few people who bothered joining WDDM and are debating and "fighting" for the cause are more interested in scoring points and feeling important in their knowledge of something or another. Reading the last few exchanges on here makes that very clear. It reminds me of "The life of Brian", when the people's front of Judeia are having a meeting whilst Brian is crucified. Stop debating about debating. Do something other than plan a meeting, for Christ sakes!! Tired of this.. From: Georges Metanomski <zgmet(at)yahoo.com> To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net Sent: Thu, 21 October, 2010 14:55:31 Subject: Re: [WDDM] Chocolate minarets and Multikulti (for Mirek) wddm@world-wide-democracy.net --- On Wed, 10/20/10, M. Kolar <wddm(at)mkolar.org> wrote: > From: M. Kolar <wddm(at)mkolar.org> > Subject: Re: [WDDM] Re: [analytical-indicant-theory] check this out > To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net > Date: Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 2:28 PM > Georges, > Your post below seems to be as helpful for improving the > relations > between different peoples as the spreading of "/*The > Protocols of the > Elders of Zion". > */* ================= G: A tiny difference: "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is a genocide inspiring FICTION, while my post deals with facts and intends to warn of organized crime and prepared genocides. Some sects are banned as organized crime, but what's the difference between sect and religion? Religion is a sect large enough not to be eradicated without a civil war. And I see, with a large majority of Europeans, Islam as the most noxious and criminal of all. In Appendix you'll find my answer to the next Richard's post "Chocolate minarets" and I'll refer to my both posts. A few selected facts: ** In the leading Eurabian country - the UK - 60% of Muslims request the recognition of Sharia and the ex-European UK gave in: Sharia became official law regulating civil cases among Muslims, all polygamous wifes get social security, etc. Discrimination of women, forced marriages, honor murders and the cruel excision without anaesthetic and aseptic procedure. The latter is worth 10 years in British court of law, but British law is not enforced and left to Sharia in the name of the sacrosanct freedom of cult. Holocaust is banned from schools where this revolting lie may hurt the delicate sensibility of pupils chanting Koran and preparing for Al Quaida training in Pakistan. ** Now, Mirek, with all my respects, the screaming of one kid tortured, infected and mutilated for life is more than all WWDDMs and all their manifestos defending crime, torture and genocide in the name of "equality of all ethnic groups and nationalities" and freedom of cult. If you defend discrimination of women, forced marriages, honor murders and excision, in the name of "human rights" and freedom of cult, our gap is too wide for any discussion. Accusing me of ethnic hatred is ridiculous. In Haifa I had hundreds of Arab students, of which one became Israeli consul in the USA. My wife exposed in the Arab Cultural Center and we consulted an Arab doctor. But all these Arabs were civilized, looked and behaved like normal, civilized people, not to distinguish from other Israelis nor from Western tourists. In sharp contrast with the imported thugs of Paris suburbs. I'm not against any ethnie, I'm against organized crime imported under cover of religion and under hypocritic protection of the freedom of cult. Organized crime intending to dominate and replace the laws of colonies, as clearly stated by Omar M. Ahmad founder of The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR):"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America , and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth," ================== Mirek: > If definitely has nothing to do with our subject matter - > the promotion > of direct democracy. ================ G: Wrong, my answer to Richard mocking the Swiss DD defends it: the right of otherwise tolerant people to eject the organised crime and attempts to pervert their country. If Europe were directly democratic, it would punish excision with 10 years and all trials to promote Sharia with deportation. The only related referendum rejected Turkey from Europe with enormous majority. With the minaret symbol the Swiss refused the multi-cultural (see Merkel below) coexistence with crime. The "tolerance" of Islam comes exclusively from the Representatives seeking Muslim and "humanistic voices. ================= Mirek: If not outright racist, it's highly > intolerant and > contains lies (e.g., those Muslims have not come to Europe > as > "conquerors and colonizers" as you write but were being > wooed by Western > European countries in the past decades in the periods of > labour > shortages as workers, also because they were willing to > work for less > than locals). ================== G: I don't care how the 50 million Muslims penetrated their Western colonies. I'm care about what they do, once there, to wit trying to supplant the local laws and habit with their organized crime aka the Sharia. ==================== Mirek: Your text is not compatible with the > principle binding to > all members that we put at > http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/join.php > after the previous hate > incident here (of which you were the immediate target): > > **THE MEMBERSHIP IN WDDM IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH MEMBERSHIP IN > GROUPS THE > GOAL OF WHICH IS RESTRICTION OF DEMOCRACY, OR IN GROUPS, > MOVEMENTS AND > PARTIES OF RACIST OR NEO-NAZI TYPE, AND WITH THE PROMOTION > OF THE VIEWS > OF SUCH GROUPS. > WDDM is strictly based on the principal of equality of all > ethnic groups > and nationalities. * ================= G: Again, the complaint of one excised kid overwrites all WDDMs and their manifestos and if they try to justify it, they belong to the same trash as racists and neo-nazists. It all boils down to one question: do you, yes or no, justify discrimination of women, forced marriages, honor murders and excision? I don't. Georges. ====================================================== APPENDIX chocolate minarets and Multiculti Under the brilliant title "chocolate minarets" Richard mocks the Swiss, who through a directly democratic referendum banned minarets from their landscape. The Swiss dared for centuries to stand for what they did and did not want and now they have shown, what they do not want, to wit to become part of Eurabia, to surrender to the third Muslim conquest and to accept multicultural coexistence with the conquerors. The idea that Sharia law will take over in the USA is so absurd as to be laughable - says Richard. Laugh, while you can. In the leading Eurabian country - the UK - 60% of Muslims request the recognition of Sharia and the ex-European UK gave in: Sharia became official law regulating civil cases among Muslims, all polygamous wifes get social security, etc. Discrimination of women, forced marriages, honor murders and the cruel excision without anaesthetic and aseptic procedure. The latter worth 10 years in British court of law, but British law is not enforced and left to Sharia in the name of the sacrosanct freedom of cult. Holocaust is banned from schools where this revolting lie may hurt the delicate sensibility of pupils chanting Koran and preparing for Al Quaida training in Pakistan. Richard embraces the ideas about Muslims and America expressed in a Muslim book: America has as much fundamentalism as anybody and is equally to blame for world terrorism. One smells the justification of Al Quaida by American terrorism and, one step deeper, the claim of 911 perpetrated by CIA and Israel. There may be some Muslim terrorists, yet they are far away in some remote Waziristan, provoked by American fundamentalism, but in the USA and Europe Muslims are about the nicest citizens, in spite of being unjustly discriminated. Says Richard: **When they come here they are teachers, scholars, doctors, lawyers, business people and there are over 15,000 of them in our military.** Well, looking at one day's news of his post's date we find several confirmations starting with the learned Muslim psychiatrist and major of "our military", Nidal Malik Hasan, charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted murder in the Fort Hood shooting. A 20-year-old Jordanian man who tried to bomb a downtown Dallas skyscraper. 4 Convicted in NYC Synagogue-Bombing Plot And in Germany, exceptionally tolerant and anti-racist as reaction to the recent Nazi crimes, the Chancellor Angela Merkel talked about the failure of the multi-cultural society: ** Germany's attempt to create a multi-cultural society has failed completely, Chancellor Angela Merkel said at the weekend, calling on the country's immigrants to learn German and adopt Christian values. Merkel weighed in for the first time in a blistering debate sparked by a central bank board member saying the country was being made "more stupid" by poorly educated and unproductive Muslim migrants. "Multikulti", the concept that "we are now living side by side and are happy about it," does not work, Merkel told a meeting of younger members of her conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party at Potsdam near Berlin. "This approach has failed, totally," she said, adding that immigrants should integrate and adopt Germany's culture and values. "We feel tied to Christian values. Those who don't accept them don't have a place here," said the chancellor. "Subsidising immigrants" isn't sufficient, Germany has the right to "make demands" on them, she added, such as mastering the language of Goethe and abandoning practices such as forced marriages. ** But why argue and debate when the agenda of American Muslims has been clearly specified by their top representative, Omar M. Ahmad founder of The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR):"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America , and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth," Let's note the "Earth", which promotes American Muslims to an active legion of the global jihad. Propounders of Multikulti with Muslim conquerors sound - mutatis mutandis - like the peaceniks of the 1930's: Quote from http://mypracticalphilosophy.com/shelp/appeasementhitler.htm In the 1930s when Germany was becoming Nazified, the Oxford Union passed a resolution that it would "in no circumstances fight for king and country." When Winston Churchill gave a speech at Oxford in which he said that British rearmament was "essential for us to be safe in our island home" the audience burst into laughter. British statesmen wanted to believe Hitler wanted peace. Thomas Jones, who had been in and out of Whitehall for a quarter century, wrote in his diary: "Rightly or wrongly, all sorts of people who have met Hitler are convinced that he is a factor for peace." Lloyd George, after meeting Hitler for an hour told the press that he regarded Hitler as "the greatest living German" and had "told him so to his face." Back in England Lloyd George wrote in the Daily Express that Hitler was "a born leader, a magnetic, dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose": to keep the peace. Substituting Hitler with Bin Laden we get: **Bin Laden is a born leader, a magnetic, dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose to keep the peace.** And that in spite of the incessant provocations by the American terrorism. Incha Allah Georges |