[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

02074: Re: [WDDM] Swiss model

From: Bruce Eggum <bruce.eggum(at)gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 08:43:58 -0500
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Swiss model

Dear Antonio,

What is it about the Swiss model you disagree with?
When the group returned from second Congress in Delphi, Greece the WDDM discussion was continually on the Swiss model.
You Antonio began a Italian Assembly to accomplish this yourself in Italy.

Of course it is just an example, because this method provides that each group should hold "Assembly" [meeting of all people] and than anyone could introduce any "Initiative" which is any topic, idea, statue change, anything for the people to consider. If the people decide the Initiative has merit, they can introduce it to Referendum where it can be accepted or rejected.

Sincerely, Bruce



On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 5:15 AM, <Antonio Rossin> wrote:
Sorry, Bruce.

this was, and still is, YOUR  initial goal - quite sectarian IMHO -
not  the initial goal of  WDDM.
Please, speak for yourself,


antonio - founding member of  WDDM






Bruce Eggum ha scritto:
Yes this was the initial WDDM goal to oversee representative government with sovereignty <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty> lodged in the assembly of all citizens <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizenship> who choose to participate.


This is really quite simple and appropriate goal. Once begun, the people have the tools to develop however they choose to run their country.   Bruce


On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Dan Smith <draciron(at)gmail.com> wrote:

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_democracy

   Swiss model our base ideal?


------------------------------------------------------------------------








[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]