Mr Antell,
Your remarks about 911 and the Pentagon? Surely you jest.
Ron W
--- On Sun, 12/28/08, Mark Antell, editor CitizenPowerMagazine.net <citizenp(at)citizenpowermagazine.net> wrote:
From: Mark Antell, editor CitizenPowerMagazine.net <citizenp(at)citizenpowermagazine.net> Subject: [WDDM] Most recent WDDM Newsletter, Nomination of Mike Gravel, To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net, jiri.polak(at)swipnet.se Cc: citizenp(at)citizenpowermagazine.net Date: Sunday, December 28, 2008, 1:12 PM
Hi Jiri,
Congratulations on your most recent edition. It's very good. I particularly like the leadoff "Strategy" article. You may expect to see a few positive words in CitizenPowerMagazine.
I'll send a re-subscription check to you via mail.
I very much like the idea of nominating Mike Gravel in recognition of his steadfast and creative commitment to direct democracy. How can I help?
Best, Mark Antell
By the way: I agree with you that something like the 911 report should be subject to review, discourse, and direct electoral adoption (or repudiation) by the public. However, I think that the straightforward explanation for what happened .... is probably what happened. Dangerous enraged fundamentalists seized passenger planes and flew them into targets. Cheaply built buildings, which were never designed for the ensuing
conflagration, collapsed. I saw this on TV and I saw the smoldering results up close here at the Pentagon.
|