[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

01799: Re: [WDDM] Regarding the social network site

From: Giorgio Menon <giorgio.menon(at)pd.infn.it>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 15:27:43 +0200
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Regarding the social network site

Georges Metanomski wrote:

Annette and Martin along with Giorgio unread to
my trash
Georges


If there's a definition that i can put on DD it's simple INCLUSION.
Anything that brings EXCLUSION begets fascism and tyranny. People
deciding their own destiny and the destiny of their homeland should
operate in inclusive ways. People wanting to impose their will upon the
others use exclusion and find any means to achieve their goals. Not
reading a comment as sign of contempt or throwing it into the trash bin
has nothing to do with sharing (ie INCLUSION) , rather with exclusion.
In this specific case there's faith playing a keyrole in the issue.
Israel can't be wrong. Never. Neither Kibbutzim. They are left-winged
(mostly) organizations, thus even more appealing for a DD believer.
"Meine Ehre heißt Treue ("My honor is called loyalty.")
Do you know where such loyalty comes from? From a SS buckle. As anyone
knows SS didn't question orders. They were educated to blindly obey. No
discussion is possible. Loyal people know, the others must simply apply
or perish.
I think our major effort should be in trying to place inclusion (ie
discussion) BEFORE loyalty, as this latter clearly separates who knows
from who doesn't apparently know (but may well have equally good
reasons, nevertheless).
I'm not going to be loyal with this group. I want to discuss about the
methods and reasons that has brought mankind in this terrible present
with a bleak future ahead. My reasons might ne right or wrong, as anyone
else's. But denying someone who, like myself, is a committed researcher
the right to be listened is something simply inhuman for the standard i
want to reach. And, hopefully, we all want to reach.

Regards

Giorgio



[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]