From: | Jon Lalanne <moelalon2000(at)yahoo.com> |
---|---|
Date: | Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:20:39 -0700 (PDT) |
Subject: | RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD |
Agreed
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolas Durand
Sent: 10 Mar 2008 01:03 PM
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Subject: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD
ok, everyone, this is completely childish, you are
behaving exactly like
politicians - nagging each other instead of moving
things forward.
It is appalling.
If you have a comment to tell someone, please tell
him/her directly and do
not bother the whole mailing list with useless
derogatory comments.
Thank you,
Nico
-----Original Message-----
From: Giorgio Menon
[giorgio.menon(at)pd.infn.it]
Sent: lundi, 10. mars 2008 11:01
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Definition of DD
Not that i know.
Giorgio
Annette and Martin wrote:
George, do you have any positive words,Metanomski" <zgmet(at)yahoo.com>
Martin
----- Original Message ----- From: "Georges
To: <wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>Worlds
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD
===============
Seems like there is no limit to idiocy.
After years and years of chat and prattle the
about.Experts and Propounders of DD find out that they
don't and did not know what they were prattling
Georges.
===============