[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

01635: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD

From: Jon Lalanne <moelalon2000(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD

All,
this is exactly what I said 3 weeks ago.... someone
let's formulate a plan a system a government of true
democracy instead of philosophizing.... this is why I
have stopped participating...

Jon Lalanne

ok, everyone, this is completely childish, you are
behaving exactly
like
politicians - nagging each other instead of moving
things forward.
It is appalling.

If you have a comment to tell someone, please tell
him/her directly and
do
not bother the whole mailing list with useless
derogatory comments.

Thank you,

Nico

--- Jim Powell <autoinfo(at)acenet.co.za> wrote:

Agreed

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolas Durand

Sent: 10 Mar 2008 01:03 PM
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Subject: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD

ok, everyone, this is completely childish, you are
behaving exactly like
politicians - nagging each other instead of moving
things forward.
It is appalling.

If you have a comment to tell someone, please tell
him/her directly and do
not bother the whole mailing list with useless
derogatory comments.

Thank you,

Nico

-----Original Message-----
From: Giorgio Menon
[giorgio.menon(at)pd.infn.it]
Sent: lundi, 10. mars 2008 11:01
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Definition of DD

Not that i know.
Giorgio

Annette and Martin wrote:

George, do you have any positive words,
Martin
----- Original Message ----- From: "Georges
Metanomski" <zgmet(at)yahoo.com>
To: <wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD


===============
Seems like there is no limit to idiocy.
After years and years of chat and prattle the
Worlds
Experts and Propounders of DD find out that they
don't and did not know what they were prattling
about.
Georges.
===============




[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]