[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

01629: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD

From: Georges Metanomski <zgmet(at)yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD

===============
Seems like there is no limit to idiocy.
After years and years of chat and prattle the Worlds
Experts and Propounders of DD find out that they
don't and did not know what they were prattling about.
Georges.
===============
--- Nicolas Durand <nicolas(at)enitiatives.ch> wrote:

This system replaces democratically elected citizens
by randomly elected
citizens. Not enough of a change in my opinion.



If someone has an idea, EVERYONE from the
collectivity should be able to
hear about it and discuss it.



Nico



_____

From: DAVID FRANK

Sent: samedi, 8. mars 2008 23:56
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Definition of DD



Could someone tell us if your website
onevoicenow.org promotes the
definition of Democracy that everyone here believes
in..Thank you , David
'Frank

wddm(at)mkolar.org wrote:

Hi everybody!
There seem to be some renewed interest in finally
arriving to the
decision of what we as a group will understand
under the term od
"Direct Democracy" - both in this list and in the
Forum.
So I have reopened (extended the closing date) of our
voting on
"What is DIRECT DEMOCRACY (DD)" at
http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/vote/ (right
half, top voting).
All voters (that is all WDDM members) can add new
alternatives
(new alternative definitions of DD) to vote on
(evaluate, rate, score)
in this voting.
When somebody adds a new alternative, all other
members (unless
they have disabled it in their profiles) will get an
e-mail
notification, so they can return and adjust their
ratings.

Mirek


[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]