[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

01458: Re: [WDDM] Anarchism and Direct Democracy

From: Antonio Rossin <rossin(at)tin.it>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:26:35 +0200
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Anarchism and Direct Democracy



Giorgio Menon ha scritto:
Antonio Rossin wrote:


But maybe you have a better definitions of my rights: please
let me know what your dictionary says about this, so i know
how far i can go.


IMHO, these are strange words in the mouth of an anarchist who,
as such, does not want any one (dictionary writers included) to tell
him how far he can go.

Of course you are not answering. I thought that questioning the authority was a necessary premise to get to an independent viewpoint. But i see this is just for the occasions you decide, not as general rule. Never question your own dictionary, or the authority telling how things really are (the Truth). Forget history, different cultures may well rot in hell.

In your own words:
"*At a collective level, it is equally known that the absence of any capacity for questioning authority represents a basic, rather a fundamental one, propensity to perform those intolerant and violent behaviours whose extreme form appears to include the so-called "holy-war" made by the kamikazes of today's Islamic religious fundamentalism"
*http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/rossin08.htm

I have to tell you that every honest anarchist knows only few rules: being responsible and respectful toward anyone (this implicitly begets the capacity of listening): any other thing about anarchy is deceitful. This is what Luigi Veronelli (the great sommelier) has always said. In his own words:
«Sono anarchico dell'unica anarchia possibile, quella cioè che prevede l'assunzione di responsabilità nel rispetto di se stessi e degli altri. Chi dice che l'anarchia è disordine, commette un falso grossolano».
“Anarchia é rispetto, sacrificio e tolleranza”
Anarchy is respect, sacrifice, tolerance

Just the opposite of what you think anarchists are. Will you ever dare to question the authority that deceitfully writes what anarchists are for the sake of the acquired and intouchable privileges?

G

PS: glad to see that you have decided that i'm an anarchist. I've only written something about anarchy, but this doesn't necessarily imply that i'm an anarchist. I see you don't lose your old habit of labelling people.


Sorry Giorgio,

I never said what the anarchists are.  I only quoted a renown English
dictionary wanting to check out what the shared meaning of the English
term "anarchy" is.

Also, I did not label you an anarchist even.  I only expressed my humble
opinion, according with my experience throughout your comments to my
posts,  that you are a guy who doesn't know -- or who knows recklessly
only -- the meaning of the English words he uses, both in reading and in
writing, but who has, by way of compensation, a discrete propensity for
cheap irony and sarcasm, as you wrote as, in your 21-08-2007 9:50 post
on this same thread:
"If i'm wrong my apologies. Let's talk about soccer then, 
do you agree?"   
That is, I agree.


Regards,

antonio

[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]