From: | Antonio Rossin <rossin(at)tin.it> |
---|---|
Date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:57:11 +0200 |
Subject: | Re: [WDDM] Repeted answer to Antonio |
Antonio Rossin wrote:(a)
(G)
The possible solutions you are talking about have to fight against
the ruling
culture that wants smart people own a fast, powerful, big car. As
long as
people keep receiving thousands of messages a day with this exact same
meaning, i think your proposal more bicycles and less cars will
never been
considered.
(a)
Of course.
(G)(a)
That's what communication is for: trying to convince people. The
elites are
immensely more communicative that we are, and this is the real problem.
We don't have access to the media, they own them: they democratically
bought them. We could have done it, but we didn't. Our fault, no?
Yes, but you surely know the old Latin ditto:
"Errare umanum est; perseverare diabolicum"
(into English: "To err is human; to keep steadily on doing it is
diabolical")
I question whether the fault is recoverable, and -- affirmatively --
how.
This is why I am discussing democracy
(G)
Diabolicum, dear Antonio, is the selfreferential system that allows
the elites to
have access to the existing resources while denying such access to
anyone else.
I don't consider myself guilty of not owning a media.
We could have done it, but we didn't. Our fault, no?
(G)
One must have stolen billion euros from common people's pockets
to own them or to have full access to them. I'm a simple worker and
i have never stolen a cent. Do you find diabolicum working all day
long to feed the family and pay the bills knowing that bankers live
a different life?
My fault may be recoverable, but i wonder if it deserves being recovered.
In all honestly i don't envy their lifes.
"Labor umanum est, sed etiam diabolicum"
Regards
Giorgio