Re: [WDDM] Democracy and Anarchy do not mix

["Bruce Eggum" <bruce.eggum(at)gmail.com>]

I agree Antonio,
We have great difficulty understanding others terms and ways. We have language, culture and different basic governments we are dealing with. Thus terms often do not "fit all". Than too it is always difficult to know if someone knows what we said, but do they know what we meant?

I think we can now go on and develop WDDM as the founding docs state, with democracy, a committee, which only helps us within WDDM develop our own organization.

ATB Bruce

On 1/26/07, Antonio Rossin wrote:

At 02.03 26/01/2007, you wrote:

Bernard Clayson wrote:

If you [Bruce] believe in rulers, why are you on this list, let alone monitoring it.

In fact I think Bruce has done us a favor, bringing the group down to some kind of reality. We've been philosophizing about democracy, and about the purpose of the list, and Bruce is forcing us to actually deal with a  control issue that affects us personally. Let's see if we can express ourselves on this issue and avoid the tasty temptation to pursue further personal attacks.

thanks Bruce,
richard

Hi all,

I substantially agree.

But let's be aware: it is an old and antidemocratic temptation, that of one's
controlling, or even dismissing as philosophy, any practice which one does
not understand -- or which one does understand as different from one's own

Regards,

antonio

--
Bruce Eggum
Gresham Wisconsin, USA
Urge to Surge
http://tinyurl.com/yndynn
http://www.doinggovernment.com/
Check out my Blog too
http://bruceeggum.blogster.com/