Re: [WDDM] Democracy and Anarchy do not mix

[Antonio Rossin <rossin(at)tin.it>]

Agreed.  That of Mirek has been a (hopefully temporary) error.

Yet, isn't it a quite intrinsic rule of democracy, the "try-and-err"

way of learning?

antonio

At 21:06 +0000 25-01-2007, Bernard Clayson wrote:

> ¤
> Bruce,
>
> I believe the power should reside with
> the people, if that makes me an anarchist - tough.
> I will continue fighting self-elected
> rulers, AND giving the power to the people where I
> can.
>
> If you believe in rulers, why are you on
> this list, let alone monitoring it.
> Has Pino pulling your strings, pulled
> your brain as well, or are you his revenge mechanism.
> You, with Pino in the background,
> monitored WDDM(1) to death, if you succeed with doing the same to
> WDDM(2), what will you do to make the hat-trick, or will Pino be
> satisfied.
> It does beg the question of why Mirek
> gave you the job of monitoring (not ruling), with your track record it
> would have been better to leave the list alone while he was
> busy.
>
> Bernard
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bruce Eggum
> To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007
> 9:30 AM
> Subject: [WDDM] Democracy and
> Anarchy do not mix
>
>
> WDDM is Worldwide
> Direct Democracy Movement
>
> <snip>
>
> Thus, all those who are members of WDDM
> and insist in trying to implement anarchist ideology into WDDM are in
> the wrong organization. Your efforts to destroy the democracy in WDDM
> have left the organization in confusion.
>
> I  therefore ask those who choose
> anarchist ideology to resign from WDDM. You may choose to join an
> anarchist organization, but you do not fit in a democratic
> organization.
>
> I hold no animosity toward anarchist's,
> we simply have different beliefs.
>
> I submit some information from Wikipedia
> which details these items I bring to your attention.
>
> Respectfully, Bruce Eggum