[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

00871: Re: [WDDM] Re: decisions at wider levels

From: Doug Everingham <dnevrghm(at)powerup.com.au>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 18:04:07 +1000
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Re: decisions at wider levels

I think one system that copes with different levels of organization seeking consensus is described by the Dutch-centred
Sociocratisch Centrum www.sociocracy.biz
Other example include Spain's Mondragón Cooperative Corporation and others described in works of Dr Shann Turnbull ,
Principal, International Institute for Self-governance
http://ssrn.com/author=26239
-- Doug Everingham
===

hdr00871-tiff.gif

Bruce, I have given it a lot of thought today .......... and the answer is NO.
Been there, done that, .......... too many times, why should I waste my time doing it again?

Regards
Bernard

----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Eggum
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Re: decisions at wider levels

So right Bernard. If you want to call WDDM a group that is fine too. However, as you said, "all that is needed is a few simple procedures of debate and decision."

That is ALL that we have tried to do for years, establish a simple method of debate (orderly) and how to make decisions (vote). Consensus is nice, but even consensus methods need to vote occasionally because not all will 100% agree on everything.

Please help to develop simple procedures of debate and decision for WDDM.

ATB Bruce


[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]