[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

00859: Re: [WDDM] Re: [WDDM] Re: decisions at wider levels

From: "Bruce Eggum" <bruce.eggum(at)gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 20:19:58 -0600
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Re: [WDDM] Re: decisions at wider levels

I agree Bernard, that is why a structure is needed (charter, constitution) to provide safegards, control power, methods to communicate, resolve issues and consider all persons input. With no method to dertermine what consensus exists, nothing can be accomplished and breeds dictorial rule.

Bruce Eggum

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Bernard Clayson" < bernard-clayson(at)shuartfarm.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:49:31 -0000
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Re: decisions at wider levels
WDDM is an internet community, and the same problems occur in government, and
local communities i.e.
How does one know whether there is a consensus without the means/method of
individuals declaring approval .... or objection?

More important, what means/method is proposed to address the concerns of
individuals in order to reach a consensus?

Regards
Bernard






--
Bruce Eggum
Gresham Wisconsin, USA, www.doinggovernment.com; Check out my Blog too: bruceeggum.blogster.com

[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]