Re: [WDDM] Parties and Politics

[Antonio Rossin <rossin(at)tin.it>]

At 0:51 +0300 26-10-2006,
=?koi8-u?B?QWNhZGVteSBvZiBEaXJlY3QgRGVtb2NyYWN5?= wrote:

>  Yes, I guess this is a good idea to create a DD political party.
>  As for us (Academy of Direct Democracy, Ukraine) we see
>  no way to create it for now but as the idea it sound good for us.
>
>
>  My best regards, Maria Ivanova


Hi Maria Ivanova,

Albert Einstein is said he stated :

        "We cannot solve the problems of a system
        by using the tools of  the same system
        that originated them".


I guess, all the ideas sound good for critical discussion --
yet I wholeheartedly appreciate the clear fact that your
Academy sees no way to create a DD political party.


Cheers,

antonio

Antonio Rossin - Neurologist
  ? Dialectical Philosopher ?
rossin(at)tin.it
http://www.flexible-learning.org

>  ==========================>  From: "Bruce Eggum" <bruce.eggum(at)gmail.com>
>  To: "WDDM world wide" <wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>,
>       CICDD <cicdd(at)yahoogroups.com>
>  Subject: [WDDM] Parties and Politics
>  Date: Thursday, October 26, 2006 12:27 AM
>
>  EUOBSERVER
>  I thank Vladimir Rott for forwarding this information.
>  As I read this, I see the value "parties" have in democracy.
>  We want to "network" our interests, but isn't a "party" a
>  network of people with similar views? If we disagree with
>  some of our "Parties" (network) views, we must bring
>  strong documentation and proof supporting our views
>  I suggest if we want DD, we may need to from a DD
>  party or introduce DD to our party to carry that view
>  into government.
>  Please comment on this, it could help us "network" our
>  DD goals.   Bruce
>
>  24.10.2006 - 09:33 CET | By Steen Gade, Sofie Carsten
>  Nielsen and S?ren Winther Lundby
>  EUOBSERVER / COMMENT - Today we are joining
>  a new party. We are already
============================(remaining quote deleted)