| From: | "Bruce Eggum" <bruce.eggum(at)gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:38:15 -0500 |
| Subject: | Will the EU I-R really work? |
Now the question is if the Europea Union Initiative Referendum process has the power to accomplish the intended goal. Bruce
One million EU citizens call for Strasbourg to be ditched
18.09.2006 - 17:40
CET | By Helena Spongenberg
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - More than one million EU citizens have called for the
European Parliament to abandon its second home in Strasbourg, while the European
Commission has distanced itself from EU communication commissioner Margot
Wallstrom's comments on Strasbourg becoming a "negative symbol of wasting
money".
The online petition - oneseat.eu - reached the one million
mark on Monday (18 September) after a group of MEPs, led by Swedish liberal Cecilia
Malmstrom, launched the website in May this year.
"If the EU is going to be able to deliver results, make decisions and
maintain the confidence of the hundreds of millions it represents, it must
adopt and get rid of the greatest anomalies," Ms Malmstrom writes on her
website.
"To be forced to travel to a second parliament 12 times a year for an
extra cost of hundreds of millions of euros a year, is not defensible,"
she explains, adding that the Strasbourg
building is empty the remaining 307 days a year.
Meanwhile the European Commission on Monday distanced itself from recent
comments by one of its members, Swedish commissioner Margot Wallstrom.
'Brussels insanity'
"It is obvious that Ms Wallstrom as a politician and as a person is
entitled to have an opinion. This needs to be distinguished from the
institutional role of the commission," commission spokesman Johannes
Laitenberger told journalists in Brussels.
"If there is a debate, it is an issue legally for the member states and
politically, first and foremost, for the parliament itself," Mr
Laitenberger said, adding that the commission should not lecture the parliament
in its ways of working.
In an interview with a Brussels-based magazine E!Sharp Ms Wallstrom was quoted
as saying that "something that was once a very positive symbol of the
European Union, reuniting France and Germany, has now become a negative symbol
- of wasting money, bureaucracy and the insanity of the Brussels
institutions."
"One has to try both to explain why it was placed there and pay respect to
that, but also say that times have changed and now this is impractical and too
expensive," she added.
The official seat in Strasbourg has been
enshrined in the EU treaty since 1992 with any revision requiring unanimous
approval of all member states, something France is unlikely to give.
EU constitution
One French diplomat told the EUobserver that "everybody will take note of
the one million citizens but I don't foresee any discussion on EU government
level."
"There is no eager and enthusiasm from the people in Brussels to make this a top priority to
improve the European Union," another EU diplomat said.
The contact explained that first of all France had a economic and a symbolic
interest in keeping the parliament on its soil and even within the parliament
there is no unanimous will to put the issue on the agenda.
The right of citizens to form an initiative and become more involved in EU
issues was part of the European Constitution.
According to the article, if a petition collects one million signatures, the
commission has to look at the issue – but the document was rejected by two
member states last year.
Ms Wallstrom's has previously stated that she considers the oneseat.eu
initiative a valid one, independently of what happens to the constitution.
Meanwhile, her fellow Swede Ms Malmstrom will on Tuesday (19 September) hold a
press conference in Stockholm
on how to move on with the initiative now the goal of one million signatures
has been reached.