From: | "John Baker" <bakerjohnj(at)hotmail.com> |
---|---|
Date: | Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:38:28 -0500 |
Subject: | Re: Epistemological Revolution (Chris et Al) |
haveOnce a global DD constitution is established I believe NMT will take> care of itself.
John I am not so sure it would be so simple. How can one establish (and
respected and observed) a DD constitution without a new way of thinking?Both
will most probably have to be done gradually, simultaneously.to be
Our experience from this WDDM forum only proves that. We are supposed
a group of DD advocates, but we have not managed in the past 7-8 months,since
we started this latest experiment in trying to establish a meaningfulWDDM, to
make any tangible progress in self-organizing ourselves.
Mirek
John Baker wrote (Dec. 6):
Yes but..
I thought this was a DD advocacy forum. Discussing NMT as a prerequisite
for DD seems off-topic to me. Personally, I believe the majority can be
trusted more than a minority. This means I am more afraid of anything
less than a democractic decision.
I do not know what the best decision is for the whole, therefore I ask
each individual for their honest opinion. The only way to do that is via
a democratic vote. Therefore, I support DD, unequivacably. I ave no
doubt that DD is better for everyone as a whole for this reason and
therefore I am not concerned about NMT.
Once a global DD constitution is established I believe NMT will take
care of itself.
Respectfully,
JB