On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:09:26AM -0500, Joshua Petersen wrote:
> The problem, in my opinion, with doing issues by a poll or by signatures is
> that it raises the possibility for citizens to be swamped by many
> legislative actions at once, not to mention it often limits the number of
> people who can show support for it. I think in this, we can take a wonderful
> democratic notion from internet sites like youtube and diggit: the "Vote up"
> option. If there's a limit on the number of legislative actions that have to
> be voted on at any given time (of course this number is alterable by vote of
> the people), and there is a single location/forum/etc for government
> legislation, then people can go and 'vote up' what they view as important
> issues. Of the submitted issues, the top (however many the people have
> decided on) will go to be voted on. If the ability to also 'vote down' an
> idea is available, then the process has many of the advantages of both a
> poll and a survey, and few of the disadvantages, while being even more
> democratic in many ways.
Self-selected opinion polls are vastly inferior to randomly selected
opinion polls.