From: | Doug Everingham <dnevrghm(at)powerup.com.au> |
---|---|
Date: | Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:10:53 +1000 |
Subject: | Re: [WDDM] Weighted voting |
No, but inevitably decision-making authorities should involve proportional inputs from relevant stakeholders (e.g. legally qualified persons and ombuds people in tribunals, health professionals and patient welfare movements in public health services, unions and engineers in public, private or mixed-management infrastructure projects, sociocracy, Mondragón, ISPO and other nested networks of stakeholders ). –Doug Everingham ==== From: autoinfo(at)acenet.co.za Subject: RE: [WDDM] Weighted voting Date: 7 October 2009 10:30:52 PM To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net Reply-To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net No. System can be manipulated Regards Jim Powell From: Esi [esi1mohseni2(at)hotmail.com] Sent: 05 Oct 2009 10:01 AM To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net Subject: Re: [WDDM] Weighted voting Hi No, but they should get paid in someway to inform those who are interested to know more. Hamid From:Lata Gouveia Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 4:12 AM To:wddm@world-wide-democracy.net Subject: [WDDM] Weighted voting Hi all, Do you agree that people who have more knowledge about a topic should have more say in a decision about that topic? Lata http://citizenmundi.wordpress.com/raw-initiatives/ |