[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

02371: Re: [WDDM] Weighted voting

From: Doug Everingham <dnevrghm(at)powerup.com.au>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:10:53 +1000
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Weighted voting

No, but inevitably decision-making authorities should involve proportional inputs
from relevant stakeholders (e.g. legally qualified persons and ombuds people in tribunals,
health professionals and patient welfare movements in public health services,
unions and engineers in public, private or mixed-management infrastructure projects,
sociocracy, Mondragón, ISPO  and other nested networks of stakeholders ).
–Doug Everingham
====
From:   autoinfo(at)acenet.co.za
Subject: RE: [WDDM] Weighted voting
Date: 7 October 2009 10:30:52 PM
To:   wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Reply-To:   wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
No. System can be manipulated


Regards

Jim Powell

From: Esi [esi1mohseni2(at)hotmail.com]
Sent: 05 Oct 2009 10:01 AM
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Weighted voting

Hi

No, but they should get paid in someway to inform those who are interested to know more.

Hamid

From:Lata Gouveia
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 4:12 AM
To:wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Subject: [WDDM] Weighted voting

Hi all,

Do you agree that people who have more knowledge about a topic should have more say in a decision about that topic?

Lata
http://citizenmundi.wordpress.com/raw-initiatives/


[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]