Dear Mr.Padmanabhan,
I have studied the system and method you propose.
The idea is good and it might work if a sufficient number of people, to begin
with in at least one country, would begin organizing it and if they would
overcome the firs threshold - having at least one person elected to a
representative body. This would require a publicity campaign costing millions.
So it boils down to the problem of activists and money. At present, I cannot
contribute by anything more than this assessment. If your movement takes off,
please let me know. There can always be new developments.
For the time being I remain,
Sincerely,
Jiri Polak
----- Original Message -----
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 7:33
AM
Subject: [WDDM] Re :[WDDM] What is the
AIM of WDDM? Mr. Jiri Polak, I am glad that you agreed about
the commonality of our views. Regarding your question on how a Global
Association of Independents (or World True Democracy Platform - the name does
not matter) can play a role in practical politics I have explained it in my
blog: http://worldtruedemocracyplatform.blogspot.com/
A
key point is selection of a candidate from the members of the association
in a fair manner, to stand in a particular election. For this I find that
the Triplet system is suitable. Kindly give your view on
this.
If a workable plan can be arrived at through discussion
among members then it can be put to vote for implementing the
same.
Sincerely,
Vijayaraghavan P
On Fri, 1 May
2009 10:29:28 +0200 wddm@world-wide-democracy.net wrote
Dear
Mr.Padmanabhan, I see that we are on the same wavelength. I presume that your proposed Association of Independents is meant to act on a global scale. I endorse it but I cannot see how such an association could play a
role in practical politics. So far, DD organisations are small (except the
Mehr Demokratie in Germany) and unable to compete with the established
Parties and Unions. Nevertheless, it´s worth trying. We´ll see. With my
best regards Jiri Polak
----- Original Message ----- From: Vijayaraghavan Padmanabhan
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 8:23 AM Subject: [WDDM] Re :[WDDM] What
is the AIM of WDDM? Mr. Jiri Polak,Fundamentally we have similar ideas.
I read your views in 'New Political System'. Under the section 'How do we achieve this', I find that your suggestion for creation of an "Association
of Independents" to contest elections and face political parties
- http://www.planet-thanet.fsnet.co.uk/nps/nps2.htm#How%20do%20we%20achieve%20this? - is basically the same as what I have been suggesting. Only thing is that I am suggesting the creation of a web-based platform to facilitate the same process. Once again I reiterate - (1) It can form a nidus for action on the ground. (2) The potential of the internet can be harnessed to the utmost advantage.Sincerely,Vijayaraghavan POn Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:03:45 0200
wddm@world-wide-democracy.net wroteHello,I agree with what Bruce has
written. If the aim of the new proposed discussion forum is to find an
alternative to political parties, I will participate. Party power
monopoly is not and cannot be democracy. Alternative models exist already,
the problem is to realize them in political practice.Sincerely, Jiri Polak----- Original Message ----- From: Vijayaraghavan
Padmanabhan To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net Sent: Thursday, April 30,
2009 1:45 PMSubject: [WDDM] Re :Re: [WDDM] Re :[WDDM] What is the AIM of
WDDM?Dear WDDM members,Bruce has not grasped what I have been trying to
tell. To make things clear, I would like to know how many members feel the
same way as Bruce. Keeping silent does not help anyone. I would urge Mirek
to conduct a poll on this issue. Once for all the aim of WDDM should be
decided. Vijayaraghavan POn Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:26:50 -0500
wddm@world-wide-democracy.net wroteDear Vijayaraghavan P and WDDM,First,
we have determined the problemis Representative Government power itself.
That is why citizens wantpower over their government, not simply to choose
different people togovern us.Second, there will always be groupswhich form
who have similar beliefs. It makes no difference if youcall them groups or
think tanks or party's, they will always be there trying toinfluence to
their way of thinking.If your group [Party] wants to fight party's gofor
it, but that is not the AIM of WDDM. WDDM chooses to developpeople power
by putting the people in charge of their governments. Ifyou agree with the AIM of WDDM than join us.Bruce[personal opinion posted as acitizen of the World and member of WDDM]Bruce EggumGresham Wisconsin, USA voteOn Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Vijayaraghavan Padmanabhan wrote:Dear Mr. Jiri Polak,The proposed platform would indeed be another discussion channel but the discussion would be centered around developing an alternative to the concept of political parties. It would be tailored to putting up candidates in elections independent of political parties and hence would have a focussed target group.It can forma nidus for action on the ground.The potential of the internet can be harnessed to the utmost advantage.Sincerely,Vijayaraghavan POn Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:01:48 0200 wddm@world-wide-democracy.net wroteDear Mr.Padmanabhan,to set up the platform you propose is surely useful, but it can only become yet another discussion channel without any real impact on concrete political systems. A transformation into true democracy must be enforced in communes, villages, towns, regions and states by local people.There is no other way.Sincerely, Jiri Polak
|