[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

01917: Re: [WDDM] Fw: PROFESSOR WICHMAN EMAIL

From: Giorgio Menon <giorgio.menon(at)pd.infn.it>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:33:05 +0200
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Fw: PROFESSOR WICHMAN EMAIL

Georges Metanomski wrote:

And so are we now. In WWIII, aggressed by Jihad.


Now we all know what War on Terror is: the Patriot Act is nothing but a
honest way to stay on the "right side" (opposing the "left side") in
this cruel war. Which has never been ratified. It means that no
sovereign State has daclared war against our beloved West; yet
Guantanamo is the perfect jail to place anyone who is suspected to be on
the "left side" and extraordinary renditions are an efficient way to
mantain this order. WWIII is nothing but an invention of a weak mind for
weak minds who cannot accept this simple reality: where money flow there
people go. So let's not pretend arabs are here for metaphysical needs:
people from Marocco, Tunisia, Egypt are doing what Italians, Greeks and
other Europeans have done for decades in the last century, ie searching
better possibilities. They call it immigration, not war.


Having moved to Europe I found the disgusting attitude of
pulling the pants down in face of the ignoble invasion,
hypocritically dressed up as Tolerant Humanism.
The fact is that we are facing the third invasion of the West by
the barbaric Islamist Jihad.


This theory is pure crap. You should first offer clear and
unquestionable numbers of this Islamist Jihad. But first do a Google
search on death toll in Iraq and Afghanistan (both muslim) caused by the
civilized West. Then we'll confront the numbers, and we'll talk about
who's killing who. And why, possibly


==============
We should condemn the illegal jailing and torture of Moslems, Arabs or
other suspects by western governments as we condemn suicide bombing of
westerners and innocents.
================
G:
Why this tendentious enumeration? Should we not condemn
all crimes? And, good Lord, should we innocent some
crimes because of some other ones?
Islamist crimes should be considered as such, without
being diluted by irrelevancies such as smuggled in anti-
semitism.

Georges
==============



I have no idea about what "Islamist crimes" in EC are. Madrid bombing
being the exception.
Georges' last comment leaves room to pro-semitism sentiments which are
exactly the opposite of the noble art of condemning all crimes which are
neither pro-semitist nor anti-semitist. Crimes are just crimes.

Regards

Giorgio

PS is Prof. Wichman aware of the similarities between the US Patriot Act
and Hitler's Enabling Act? Not surpisingly they came after a "threat for
national security" called WTC in NY and the Reichstag Fire in Berlin.
Arabs and communists have been the scapegoats.
http://www.illuminati-news.com/patriot-act-vs-german-enabling-act.htm




[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]