Re: [WDDM] Re:[WDDM] Non direct-democracy items

[Georges Metanomski <zgmet(at)yahoo.com>]

--- On Fri, 9/5/08, tobuz <tobuz(at)libero.it> wrote:

> From: tobuz <tobuz(at)libero.it>
> Subject: [WDDM] Re:[WDDM] Non direct-democracy items
> To: "wddm" <wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>
> Date: Friday, September 5, 2008, 1:14 AM
> How can anybody disagree ?
> Let's talk about Direct Democracy
>
> Federico Tonini
> Democrazia Federale
> Italy
> ---------- Initial Header -----------
>
> From      : "Jim Powell" autoinfo(at)acenet.co.za
> To          : wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
> Cc          :
> Date      : Mon, 1 Sep 2008 04:59:03 +0200
> Subject : [WDDM] Non direct-democracy items
> Hi All,
>
> Enough now.
> This forum is to promote the employers (voters) to be in
> control of the
> employees (politicians).
>
> There are plenty of other forums to express opposing
> political views.
> I would like to raise a vote for all non direct-democracy
> items to be excluded.
>
> The administrators to decide on appropriate entries.
> The person who has had > his item blocked may appeal the
> decision.
>
> Keep the focus.
> Regards
> > Jim Powell
================
G:
This forum is NOT to promote any ways of employment.
By his own criteria JP's post should be blocked as it
obviously does not talk about DD, nor he seems to have
any idea about it. He seems to see DD as
dictatorship of Administrators'(?), who, judging by WDDM's
history don't seem to know either what DD is about.
BTW, in my post I protested exactly against WDDM becoming
a crap discharge of venomous topics unrelated to DD.
So does JP want it to be such discharge or not. An
elementary reading course seems advisable.
Georges
================