[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

01723: Re: [WDDM] Getting the whole picture about DD

From: Antonio Rossin <rossin(at)tin.it>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 07:52:50 +0100
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Getting the whole picture about DD

Georges:

My question is: Why the people do not want to implement DD
(such as it is defined in many valuable DD documents, eg., in
your Shadow Parliament)?

Your answer follows :"Because they do not read my Shadow
Parliament document."

Then I question : Why the people do not want to read your
Shadow Parliament document - nor any alike DD valuable
document - ?

Your answer (below) seems to be, substantially: Because t
hey did not read my Shadow Parliament document.

Finally, my question becomes: How could we make the people's
majority go and read your Shadow Parliament document, and
all the alike DD valuable documents?


Be well,

antonio









Georges Metanomski wrote:
--- Antonio Rossin <rossin(at)tin.it> wrote:


Georges,

tell me please:

which condition sounds essential in order to:

(quote)
--------------
1.Getting a Shadow Parliament within the Particracy.

2.Establish a logistic 3 Functions support.

3.Propound Sincerity, which appears to be the
critical condition of DD.
---------------
(unquote)

Please explain.

================
G:
What is there to explain? Detailed explanation is in
the "Shadow Parliament". Say, which detail you find
too difficult for you and I'll try to help.
================

, the only reaistic start should be: "Since DD

is not in... what shall we do, to make it succeed?"

==============
G:
That's what is written in Shadow Parliament.

It's structured, so that it may be referred to point
by point.

If you don't understanding a point, ask.

If you disagree with a point, say why.

But I'm not prepared to rewrite in each post a
complete essay, just because somebody refuses
to read it.

Georges


[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]