Re: [WDDM] Getting the whole picture about DD

[Georges Metanomski <zgmet(at)yahoo.com>]

--- Antonio Rossin <rossin(at)tin.it> wrote:

> Georges Metanomski ha scritto:
> > --- Antonio Rossin <rossin(at)tin.it> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Georges,
> > >
> > > There are some flaws about your three functions
> (+1)
> > > below:
> > >
> > > 1. Supporting individual proposals is at
> > > powerholders' hands, who
> > > usually support and select the proposals that are
> in
> > > support to just
> > > themselves.
> > ==============
> > G:
> > Once in DD, there is no "powerholder" else than
> the
> > Forum. Support of individual proposals is a
> function
> > of the logistic support, which accepts and
> dieplays
> > proposals for the next step, the debate.
> > ==============
> (ant)
> I agree on what you wrote, that in DD there is no
> "powerholder" etc.
>
> It is the word "Once" which makes me smile.  You're
> speaking as
> if DD were just out of the door, ready to come in,
...
================
G:
Impossible to discuss if you don't read what I wrote
and put in my mouth the opposite of what I asserted.

QUOTE of Shadow Parliament
Three issues seem essential for starting to move
towards the DD:

1.Getting a Shadow Parliament within the Particracy.

2.Establish a logistic 3 Functions support.

3.Propound Sincerity, which appears to be the
critical condition of DD.
UNQUOTE

QUOTE
If Logistics requires at least a generation,
Sincerity will come still later, if ever,
UNQUOTE

So I don't speak about DD as if it were just
out of the door.

Yet, I suggest a DD based militant group viz. the
"Shadow Parliament", internally DD structured and to
which would internally apply all my DD assertions.

WDDM could evolve to such a group if it stopped
"discussing" silly cliches and decided to became
sincere.

Georges
================