Re: [WDDM] Getting the whole picture about DD

["Annette and Martin" <ajackson123(at)bigpond.com>]

The world has a Shadow Government and it's called the Committee of 300.
The Committee of 300 Ultimate Goal:

Is to have the Undisputed Control of the wealth, natural resources and
people power of the entire world

Empowering people and breaking down the secret networks is the key

And there are signs of people starting to rise up against this.

We are programmed from childhood

Watch this to see how they have influenced education
Illuminati: The Hidden Agenda for World Government in interview with Norman
Dodd
http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=-7373201783240489827&q=Illuminati%3A+The+Hidden+Agenda+for+World+Government+with+Norman+Dodd&total=3&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1

Somethings l question how democratic SOME people are, in WDDM, you either
support what it stands for or you don't

We have to have a sellable starting point, and the Swish System is a good
point to start, l question did the Elite play a role in establishing the
Swish System, because they knew it would deliver a good system of
government, a safe place for their banking.

Martin Jackson

----- Original Message -----
From: "Giorgio Menon" <giorgio.menon(at)pd.infn.it>
To: <wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Getting the whole picture about DD


> *Charles Bukowski quotes* <http://thinkexist.com/quotes/charles_bukowski/>
>
>
>  “The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a
>  democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you
>  don't have to waste your time voting.”
>
>
> Regards
> Giorgio
>
> Jon Lalanne wrote:
>
> > The cheepest most efficient form of government is a
> > dictatorship as long as the dictator is
> > benevolent....some of the best governments in the
> > world are dictatorships...
> >
> >
> > --- Antonio Rossin <rossin(at)tin.it> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Jim Powell ha scritto:
> > >
> > > > Hi Antonio,
> > > >
> > > > I do not agree that this will lead to
> > > dictatorship.
> > >
> > > > We may disagree with the methods that are put
> > > forward but this
> > > > concentrates on the differences.
> > > >
> > > > Mainstream communication is required.
> > > Hi Jim,
> > >
> > > These words of yours sound strange to a fellow -
> > > like me -
> > > who lived in a country ( Italy) under fascistic
> > > dictatorship.
> > > Maybe in your country you've got no such background.
> > >
> > > > The best way is to introduce “the way things work”
> > > into the school
> > > > curriculum.
> > > > This would examine the way in which decisions are
> > > made.
> > >
> > > > The fertile mind of the child would then ask why?
> > > I do not agree totally with this .
> > > The best way is to introduce "the way things work"
> > > into the family
> > > curriculum, at the zero-to-three age, when parents
> > > are still the only
> > > teachers and the child is learning communicated
> > > things not only, but
> > > also how communication works within interpersonal
> > > (within social,
> > > later) relationships. There the problem is, how to
> > > save children from
> > > their "fertile minds" getting sterilized by family
> > > dictatorship, imho.
> > >
> > > About this topic, if you were interested in, I have
> > > some stuff at:
> > http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/rossin08.htm
> >
> > > (and at .../rossin09.htm, if you were interested in
> > > how differences
> > > work inside mainstream communication, to wit,
> > > Dialectics.)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Simple logic would then have them realize that the
> > > system is not
> > > > representative of the will of the people.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Jim Powell
> > > See my "idea" about this point in a previous post of
> > > mine.
> > >
> > > There I question: how does the real will of the
> > > people work?
> > > " - for good or bad purposes - ? "
> > >
> > > Which becomes, now: "with a fertile or with a
> > > sterilized mind?"
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > ant
> > >
> > > > *From:* Antonio Rossin
> > > > *Sent:* 13 Mar 2008 07:34 AM
> > > > *To:* wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
> > > > *Cc:* epistemology(at)yahoogroups.com
> > > > *Subject:* Re: [WDDM] Getting the whole picture
> > > about DD
> > >
> > > > Georges,
> > > >
> > > > The problem of (the lack of) Democracy is not that
> > > of
> > >
> > > > communicating valuable stuff -- such as yours
> > > below --
> > >
> > > > to people.
> > > >
> > > > Instead, it is about how to communicate any stuff
> > > --
> > >
> > > > encompassing yours -- to people, so to enable them
> > > > to deal with.
> > > >
> > > > In other words, that's not a problem of
> > > communicating.
> > >
> > > > That's a problem of meta-communicating.
> > > >
> > > > If you were unable to understand the difference,
> > > as you
> > >
> > > > seem as, you are a damage to Democracy, because
> > > you
> > >
> > > > are leading towards (scientific) dictatorship.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > antonio
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Georges Metanomski ha scritto:
> > > >
> > > > --- Vijayaraghavan Padmanabhan
> > > > <vijayaraghavan.p(at)rediffmail.com>
> > > <vijayaraghavan.p(at)rediffmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I&amp;BR is focussed on
> > > >
> > > >    the process that would enable True Democracy
> > > but it
> > >
> > > >    does not tell us how to get there.
> > > >
> > > > =============
> > > > G:
> > > > For once a reasonable statement. It's not for us
> > > to
> > >
> > > > discusse, let alone to dictate which forms should
> > > take
> > >
> > > > the DD governance. Once established, it will be
> > > for
> > >
> > > > the
> > > > Forum to determine them. All we can do is to see
> > > how
> > >
> > > > to
> > > > get there. Years ago I proposed a way that I
> > > called
> > >
> > > > "Shadow Parliament". I cannot be judge and party,
> > > so
> > >
> > > > it should be discussed by other people.
> > > > It's available in
> > http://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/POLITICS/shadow_eng.html
> >
> > > > I quote here it's conclusion:
> > > > QUOTE
> > > > Three issues seem essential for starting to move
> > > > towards the DD:
> > > > 1.Getting a Shadow Parliament within the
> > > Particracy.
> > >
> > > > 2.Establish a logistic 3 Functions support.
> > > > 3.Propound Sincerity, which appears to be the critical condition of DD.
> > > > A very limited
> > > experience
> > >
> > > > seems to point to "self applicable attitude". An example: A small forum
> > > > discussed pollution and found out
> > > > rightly or wrongly that the worst pollution source is the factory
> > > > breeding of animals. Besides pollution it involves unacceptable
> > > > suffering of animals and
> > > mental
> > >
> > > > corruption of attendants who become potential
> > > sadistic
> > >
> > > > Auschwitz guards. The group condemned eating meat.
> > > Not
> > >
> > > > as a theoretical principle, but as a self applying
> > > >
> > > > decision and all members stopped eating meat.
> > > > Another very limited and positive experience
> > > consisted
> > >
> > > > in stages in Kibbutzim, confronting fellows with
> > > the
> > >
> > > > sincerity of the unique ever realized genuine DD.
> > > > UNQUOTE
> > > > =============