From: | "Annette and Martin" <ajackson123(at)bigpond.com> |
---|---|
Date: | Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:15:35 +1030 |
Subject: | Re: [WDDM] Getting the whole picture about DD |
Hitler Stalin and lenin were not benevolent
dictators...
benevolent |bəˈnevələnt|
adjective
well meaning and kindly : a benevolent smile.
. (of an organization) serving a charitable rather
than a profit-making purpose : a benevolent fund.
DERIVATIVES
benevolence noun
benevolently adverb
ORIGIN late Middle English : from Old French
benivolent, from Latin bene volent- 'well wishing,'
from bene 'well' + velle 'to wish.'
Thesaurus
benevolent
adjective
1 a benevolent patriarch kind, kindly, kindhearted,
bighearted, good-natured, good, benign, compassionate,
caring, altruistic, humanitarian, philanthropic;
generous, magnanimous, munificent, unselfish,
openhanded, beneficent; literary bounteous. antonym
unkind, tightfisted.
2 a benevolent institution charitable, nonprofit,
not-for-profit; formal eleemosynary.
--- DAVID FRANK <davidafrank1948(at)yahoo.com> wrote:
A dictatorship..That sounds great..Maybe Hitler,http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/rossin08.htm
Stalin, Lenin and the like will take it easy on us
this time..Would you please check out
onevoicenow.org for an idea for a real
democracy..your opinion is appreciated...David Frank
Jon Lalanne <moelalon2000(at)yahoo.com> wrote: The
cheepest most efficient form of government is a
dictatorship as long as the dictator is
benevolent....some of the best governments in the
world are dictatorships...
--- Antonio Rossin wrote:
Jim Powell ha scritto:background.
dictatorship.
Hi Antonio,
I do not agree that this will lead to
forward but this
We may disagree with the methods that are put
concentrates on the differences.
Mainstream communication is required.
Hi Jim,
These words of yours sound strange to a fellow -
like me -
who lived in a country ( Italy) under fascistic
dictatorship.
Maybe in your country you've got no such
work"
The best way is to introduce "the way things
into the schoolare
curriculum.
This would examine the way in which decisions
made.why?
The fertile mind of the child would then ask
have
I do not agree totally with this .
The best way is to introduce "the way things work"
into the family
curriculum, at the zero-to-three age, when parents
are still the only
teachers and the child is learning communicated
things not only, but
also how communication works within interpersonal
(within social,
later) relationships. There the problem is, how to
save children from
their "fertile minds" getting sterilized by family
dictatorship, imho.
About this topic, if you were interested in, I
some stuff at:
http://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/POLITICS/shadow_eng.html(and at .../rossin09.htm, if you were interestedin
how differencesthe
work inside mainstream communication, to wit,
Dialectics.)
Simple logic would then have them realize that
system is notof
representative of the will of the people.See my "idea" about this point in a previous post
Regards
Jim Powell
mine.that
There I question: how does the real will of the
people work?
" - for good or bad purposes - ? "
Which becomes, now: "with a fertile or with a
sterilized mind?"
Regards
ant
about DD
*From:* Antonio Rossin
*Sent:* 13 Mar 2008 07:34 AM
*To:* wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
*Cc:* epistemology(at)yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [WDDM] Getting the whole picture
Georges,
The problem of (the lack of) Democracy is not
ofstuff
communicating valuable stuff -- such as yoursbelow --
to people.
Instead, it is about how to communicate any
--them
encompassing yours -- to people, so to enable
shouldto deal with.communicating.
In other words, that's not a problem of
That's a problem of meta-communicating.as you
If you were unable to understand the difference,
seem as, you are a damage to Democracy, becauseyou
are leading towards (scientific) dictatorship.wrote:
Regards,
antonio
Georges Metanomski ha scritto:
--- Vijayaraghavan Padmanabhan
but it
I&BR is focussed on
the process that would enable True Democracy
to
does not tell us how to get there.
=============
G:
For once a reasonable statement. It's not for us
discusse, let alone to dictate which forms
takeparty,
the DD governance. Once established, it will befor
thehow
Forum to determine them. All we can do is to see
tocalled
get there. Years ago I proposed a way that I
"Shadow Parliament". I cannot be judge and
so
it should be discussed by other people.
It's available in
theParticracy.
I quote here it's conclusion:
QUOTE
Three issues seem essential for starting to move
towards the DD:
1.Getting a Shadow Parliament within the
experience
2.Establish a logistic 3 Functions support.
3.Propound Sincerity, which appears to be the
critical condition of DD. A very limited
seems to point to "self applicable attitude".
An example:
A small forum discussed pollution and found out
rightly
or wrongly that the worst pollution source is
itfactory breeding of animals. Besides pollution
meat.involves unacceptable suffering of animals andmental
corruption of attendants who become potentialsadistic
Auschwitz guards. The group condemned eating
Notapplying
as a theoretical principle, but as a self
DD.
decision and all members stopped eating meat.consisted
Another very limited and positive experience
the
in stages in Kibbutzim, confronting fellows with
sincerity of the unique ever realized genuine
UNQUOTE
=============