Re: [WDDM] Getting the whole picture about DD

[DAVID FRANK <davidafrank1948(at)yahoo.com>]

Did you have a chance to look at onevoicenow.org and check out their solution page??Sure would appreciate your opinion..Thanks,,David Frank

Antonio Rossin <rossin(at)tin.it> wrote:
>            Georges,
>
>  The problem of (the lack of) Democracy is not that of
>  communicating valuable stuff -- such as yours below --
>  to people.
>
>  Instead, it is about how to communicate any stuff --
>  encompassing yours -- to people, so to enable them
>  to deal with.
>
>  In other words, that's not a problem of communicating.
>  That's a problem of meta-communicating.
>
>  If you were unable to understand the difference, as you
>  seem as, you are a damage to Democracy, because you
>  are leading towards (scientific) dictatorship.
>
>
>  Regards,
>
>  antonio
>
>
>
>
>
>  Georges Metanomski ha scritto:
> > --- Vijayaraghavan Padmanabhan
> > <vijayaraghavan.p(at)rediffmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I&R is focussed on
> > > the process that would enable True Democracy but it
> > > does not tell us how to get there.
> > >    
> > =============
> > G:
> > For once a reasonable statement. It's not for us to
> > discusse, let alone to dictate which forms should take
> > the DD governance. Once established, it will be for
> > the
> > Forum to determine them. All we can do is to see how
> > to
> > get there. Years ago I proposed a way that I called
> > "Shadow Parliament". I cannot be judge and party, so
> > it should be discussed by
> >  other people.
> >
> > It's available in
> >
> > http://findgeorges.com/ROOT/WRITINGS/POLITICS/shadow_eng.html
> >
> > I quote here it's conclusion:
> >
> > QUOTE
> > Three issues seem essential for starting to move
> > towards the DD:
> >
> > 1.Getting a Shadow Parliament within the Particracy.
> >
> > 2.Establish a logistic 3 Functions support.
> >
> > 3.Propound Sincerity, which appears to be the
> > critical condition of DD. A very limited experience
> > seems to point to "self applicable attitude".
> > An example:
> > A small forum discussed pollution and found out
> > rightly
> > or wrongly that the worst pollution source is the
> > factory breeding of animals. Besides pollution it
> > involves unacceptable suffering of animals and mental
> > corruption of attendants who become potential sadistic
> > Auschwitz guards. The group condemned eating meat. Not
> > as a theoretical
> >  principle, but as a self applying
> > decision and all members stopped eating meat.
> > Another very limited and positive experience consisted
> >
> > in stages in Kibbutzim, confronting fellows with the
> > sincerity of the unique ever realized genuine DD.
> > UNQUOTE
> > =============
> >