[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

01634: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD

From: "Jim Powell" <autoinfo(at)acenet.co.za>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:07:32 +0200
Subject: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD

Agreed

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolas Durand
Sent: 10 Mar 2008 01:03 PM
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Subject: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD

ok, everyone, this is completely childish, you are behaving exactly like
politicians - nagging each other instead of moving things forward.
It is appalling.

If you have a comment to tell someone, please tell him/her directly and do
not bother the whole mailing list with useless derogatory comments.

Thank you,

Nico

-----Original Message-----
From: Giorgio Menon
Sent: lundi, 10. mars 2008 11:01
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Definition of DD

Not that i know.
Giorgio

Annette and Martin wrote:

George, do you have any positive words,
Martin
----- Original Message ----- From: "Georges Metanomski" <zgmet(at)yahoo.com>
To: <wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: [WDDM] Definition of DD


===============
Seems like there is no limit to idiocy.
After years and years of chat and prattle the Worlds
Experts and Propounders of DD find out that they
don't and did not know what they were prattling about.
Georges.
===============



[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]