[Prev] [Next] [Index]
[Thread Index]
01361: Fw: FW: [WDDM] Venomous vomits
From: |
"Annette Jackson" <aja95799(at)bigpond.net.au> |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:37:59 +1000 |
Subject: |
Fw: FW: [WDDM] Venomous vomits |
In light of all the comments made around my posting
of The Adam Weishaupt and Mayer Rothschild plans, which was presented by
Ted Gunderson ex FBI on You tube -NWO, ILLUMINATI, SATANISM, & THE
CIA,who seem to have creditablity, l believe it is best that l leave
WDDM, it was only presented as information, l believe you should know
what you are fighting against when you are trying to achieve something like
Direct Democracy.
Personnally l do believe there is a conspiracy, and
have being trying to put the puzzle together.
The fact that a few percent control the wealth of
the world is no accident.
I have decided the way l am going to go in
Australia is to promote the Swiss system, and enlist as many groups and
political parties that will support it, l have enjoyed the various decisions,
but there is not magic solution to this, "average person" is a challenge to
motivate.
Georges Metanomski l am sorry if l caused you
painful thoughts.
As far as tolerance, any of my work colleges, would
testify l am the least racist person they know.
All the Best
Martin Jackson
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: FW: [WDDM] Venomous
vomits
> Hi!
> I agree that such posts are very off the
topic here, but it was not
> Georges Metanomski who started this
discussion. Although I have many
> disagreements with Georges, I fully
understand his outburst in reaction
> to Martin Jackson's post full of
old lies and absolute garbage that were
> used in the past to foment the
hate of Jews that eventually lead to
> Holocaust. One cannot believe that
intelligent people are still
> repeating them today. It all leads to a
very unfortunate and tragic
> vicious circle: Israel and its defenders
over-reacting and "digging-in"
> in face of these repeated old
anti-semitic falsifications because they
> genuinely fear a new Holocaust
hearing all that again, and possibly even
> well-meaning people joining
in citing all that old garbage in response
> of Israeli over-reactions.
How to stop it????
>
> I agree with Mark's proposal to add to
the Charter something on
> tolerance (we were discussing the need of
ethical guidelines long time
> ago), and/or still better as Georges
suggested, a requirement that
> discussion should be limited to matters
pertaining to DD only. But the
> problem is how to enforce it? Is
it enforceable? Pertinence to DD can be
> perhaps judged easier than
(in-)tolerance. Who would decide what is
> permitted? All of us
together? Anyone has some at least little personal
> biases. So maybe the
best approach would be to formulate it as a strong
> recommendation and
hope that it will work, and occasionally have to live
> with a discussion
like this one which in the end may even lead to some
> newfound
understanding for some of the participants, and try to stop it
> only if
it starts to be be too annoying????
>
> Mirek
>
>
> Nicolas Durand wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I
am not sure that this kind of messages belongs to this list. Should
we
>>allow
that?
>>
>>Nico
>>
>>-----Original
Message-----
>>From: Georges Metanomski [zgmet(at)yahoo.com]
>>Sent: lundi, 16. juillet 2007 20:36
>>To: epistemology(at)yahoogroups.com;
epistemology(at)googlegroups.com;
>>wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
>>Subject: [WDDM]
Venomous vomits
>>
>>I read periodically in all my lists
fanatic,
>>venomous vomits of antisemitism and
anti-
>>americanism dressed up as anti-zionism,
anti-
>>imperialism and humanism. They boil down to
>>to
propaganda of Islamist Jihad, with all its
>>atrocities including the
preparations of the
>>second Holocaust.
>>This time my
reaction is triggered by two posts:
>>
>>-In WDDM by some lady
in the best tradition of
>> The Protocol Of
Zion
>>
>>-In Google Epistemology, the hateful venom
>> deposited by nominal9.
>>
>>To keep the record
straight, I repeat that
>>I welcome all rational and well
documented
>>critique of any scientific, social or
political
>>
> ............
>
[Prev] [Next] [Index]
[Thread Index]