Re: [WDDM] Fwd: [sociocracy] Digest Number 373

[Doug Everingham <dnevrghm(at)powerup.com.au>]

Sorry, Bruce, I can't agree.
Far from it being "obvious" to me that "Sociocracy can NOT apply" to DD,
I see voting WITHOUT nested networks of stakeholders (e.g. as in Sociocrac,
the Mondragón Cooperative Corporation etc., will be hijacked by mmaffiaccs:
= media, military, admnistrative, financial, fundmentalist/fanatic, industrial,
academic complexes, caels ad cabals}.

Quite obviously Sociocracy can NOT apply to WDDM
This also brings into question the whole "consensus" rational.
I think we need to stick with voting. (democracy)
Bruce
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: sociocracy(at)yahoogroups.com
Date: 20 May 2007 09:58:31 -0000
Subject: [sociocracy] Digest Number 373
To: sociocracy(at)yahoogroups.com

Sociocracy
Messages In This Digest (4 Messages)
...
[cut by D E ]
...
Consent decision making only works in a group of people who:

1. Share a common aim and
2. Can reflect together on how best to achieve that aim
3. The group consents to who is included in the group (and thus in
the decision making).

If these three conditions cannot be met, then majority vote or
autocratic decision making works best.
...
[cut by D E ]
...