[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

01140: Re: [WDDM] WDDM Board - Communication Process

From: "Bruce Eggum" <bruceeggum(at)gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 01:46:01 -0500
Subject: Re: [WDDM] WDDM Board - Communication Process

This is a good beginning. I agree with using the Forum to post everything and keep track of responses. Forum is also a great place to post ideas, suggestions and initiatives for consideration. They can be updated and improved from the comments on them. Than if accepted can go on to referendum.

This is beginning a process and infrastructure to allow all to "democratically" have their say, and the final decision based on referendum (vote). As we realize many decisions can be completed by the board, we can draw statues which allow many of their decisions to pass, subject to I&R if we disagree.

Regards, Bruce

On 5/24/07, George L. Kokkas Law Office wrote:
 I absolutely agree with the texts below!
 I think that M. Kolar , under his WDDM capacity as moderator of our site , slould also have access and saying to all our Communication Processes.

George Kokkas
----- Aρχικό μήνυμα -----
Από: Mark Antell, editor CitizenPowerMagazine.net
Προς: Richard Moore ; George Kokkas
Κοιν.: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Αποστολή: Τρίτη, 22 Μαΐου 2007 9:40 πμ
Θέμα: [WDDM] WDDM Board - Communication Process

Richard,  George,

How's this?

Mark Antell, member
WDDM executive board

PS.  To all recipients.  Please read this note to the end before reacting.  Thanks.
------------------------

Proposed motion concerning executive board communications:

The WDDM charter requires that executive board communications be carried out openly.
However, discussing business issues in the general WDDM Forum might tend to disrupt and confuse other discussion.
Therefore, WDDM shall set up a Forum for executive board communication.
Posting-rights to this Forum shall be limited to the executive board, plus all candidates in the recent election.  All WDDM members shall have read privileges.

Notes:

Our executive board has three members.  Approval by a majority (ie. two of us) is needed for the motion to pass.  Mirek has agreed to set up an executive board Forum as mentioned above, if that's what we want.

I urge passage,  It will allow us to frame and initiate general membership discussion on substantive issues like, for example: completing a mission statement, addressing WDDM finances, and beginning to interact with other direct democracy groups.

The consequences of passage by the executive board are described in item 11 of the Charter:
1. A motion passed by the executive board has only temporary validity.  It must be presented to the membership for a ratification vote.
2. Ratification voting is open for two weeks after a motion is posted for vote.

For completeness sake, it may be noted that the WDDM Charter specifies (under item 9) an alternate, initiative, method for posting a motion for vote by the membership.  If a proposed motion is seconded by three members it shall be posted for a binding vote by the general membership.

--
Bruce Eggum
Gresham Wisconsin, USA
Urge to Surge
http://tinyurl.com/yndynn
http://www.doinggovernment.com/
Check out my Blog too
http://bruceeggum.blogster.com/

[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]