[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

01089: Re to Mirek: [WDDM] Elections

From: "Filia den Hollander" <fkdh(at)xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 12:13:30 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re to Mirek: [WDDM] Elections

Hey, Mirek,

I can also cast the same vote secretely.

If you know what I mean...


Kind regards,
Filia



Hi again!
Since yesterday, we got 3 more votes/opinions on how to conduct WDDM
Board
elections: 1 on the site for secret ballot (with option to disclose
afterwards), and 2 by e-mail for open vote. So it's now 3 votes for open
vote,
to 4 for secret vote (3.5 for secret and 3.5 for open if you want). So
that's
no consensus at all. According to the consensus-based simple initial rules
I
was advocating two years ago at WDDM relaunch, we should now wait and
continue
discussion until better consensus is reached.
But this charter/board business has been already dragging long enough.
So
what do you say to the following compromise: Let's use both methods for
this
election. Those who prefer open vote may send in their vote by e-mail (as
Filia
and Jiri more or less have already done), and those who prefer the secret
ballot could do it on the voting page on the WDDM site (for this hybrid
case I
would not scramble voter IDs in the voting database to make sure somebody
does
not vote both by e-mail and on the site).
If you agree with this, no action is needed. You need to reply only if
you
object a hybrid vote. I'll wait for another day to see if there are any
objections.

Mirek


[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]