I would like to vote positive towards Mr Khan's
involvement.
I would also like to give my reason - because the
challenge we face must be looked at from many different perspectives and
deviation from the ideal of democracy is necessary to understand it's
growth.
I would also like to suggest that if we approve or
disapprove someone, there should be a reason. I was unhappy to see that Jiri had
not given a reason, since I am curious why someone would not be allowed into
such a democratic group as this.. That is definitely not
democratic.
Warm regards
----- Original Message -----
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 4:25
AM
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Aprove a new
member I read his plan and approve of many of his points. I remarked
on his post at WDDM here: http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/forum/read.php?15,381
Alhough
he does not directly take on the representatives, he rearranges their
power.
I think a good idea to recognize that we each have different
talents and to join together like people into nine groups to bring out their
specialty is a good idea.
I vote to include Mr. Sabzali Khan in
WDDM.
BrEggum
On 1/27/07, WDDM
webmaster < wbm@world-wide-democracy.net
> wrote:
Dear
all,
Mr. Sabzali Khan, whom we discussed before (who promotes a kind
of meritocracy, and whose e-mails all who responded to my previous
question did not want to receive), registered as a new WDDM member,
see: http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/SAK
What to do with him? Accept him anyway, remove? Please send in
your opinions on this question. Is it clear from the present wording
of our mission statement at http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/
that his system is not compatible with our ideals? Is the wording of
our mission statement clear
enough?
Thanks, Mirek
-- Bruce Eggum Gresham Wisconsin, USA Urge to
Surge http://tinyurl.com/yndynn http://www.doinggovernment.com/ Check
out my Blog too http://bruceeggum.blogster.com/
|