Re: [WDDM] Aprove a new member

["Maria Ivanova" <brains.vs.money(at)gmail.com>]

I guess the question is quite clear: if he fully agrees and accepts
WDDM ideals and terms of participance and any other conditions
applyable to all WDDM – then he has a true right to be accepted as the
member if he wants to. But as I see he disagrees with some our common
points.

2007/1/28, Bruce Eggum <bruce.eggum(at)gmail.com>:
> I read his plan and approve of many of his points. I remarked on his post at
> WDDM here:
> http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/forum/read.php?15,381
>
> Alhough he does not directly take on the representatives, he rearranges
> their power.
>
> I think a good idea to recognize that we each have different talents and to
> join together like people into nine groups to bring out their specialty is a
> good idea.
>
> I vote to include Mr. Sabzali Khan in WDDM.
>
> BrEggum
>
>
> On 1/27/07, WDDM webmaster <wbm@world-wide-democracy.net > wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Mr. Sabzali Khan, whom we discussed before (who promotes a kind of
> meritocracy,
> > and whose e-mails all who responded to my previous question did not want
> to
> > receive), registered as a new WDDM member, see:
> > http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/SAK
> >
> > What to do with him? Accept him anyway, remove? Please send in your
> opinions on
> > this question.
> > Is it clear from the present wording of our mission statement at
> > http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/ that his system is
> not compatible with our
> > ideals?
> > Is the wording of our mission statement clear enough?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mirek
>
> --
> Bruce Eggum
> Gresham Wisconsin, USA
> Urge to Surge
> http://tinyurl.com/yndynn
> http://www.doinggovernment.com/
> Check out my Blog too
> http://bruceeggum.blogster.com/
>
>
>    vote


--
Академія прямої демократії | Academy of Direct Democracy
http://academydd.iatp.org.ua/