Bruce,
The best systems grow from simple beginnings, all that is needed is a few
simple procedures of debate and decision.
From that, things can grow according to need.
Trying to construct an organisation from a standing start is fraught with
complications, not least of which is do the members want one, and that leads
back to my question of a couple of years ago i.e. organisation ..... or an
association of people with guts enough to challenge the existing system.
How many members actually want an organisation?
Regards
Bernard
----- Original Message -----
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Re: [WDDM] Re: decisions at wider
levels
I
agree Bernard, that is why a structure is needed (charter, constitution) to
provide safegards, control power, methods to communicate, resolve issues and
consider all persons input. With no method to dertermine what consensus
exists, nothing can be accomplished and breeds dictorial rule.
Bruce Eggum
----------
Forwarded message ----------
From: "Bernard Clayson" < bernard-clayson(at)shuartfarm.fsnet.co.uk
>
To:
<wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>
Date:
Fri, 29 Dec 2006 14:49:31 -0000
Subject: Re: [WDDM] Re: decisions at wider
levels
WDDM is an internet community, and the same problems occur in
government, and
local communities i.e.
How does one know whether there
is a consensus without the means/method of
individuals declaring approval
.... or objection?
More important, what means/method is proposed to
address the concerns of
individuals in order to reach a
consensus?
Regards
Bernard