ReQuest for Defining "a bottom-up origin"

["S'ace orange" <cjdegroot(at)orange.nl>]

dear members,

a profound comment of our fellow contributor antonio

calls for a reply or even more a collaborative process with the outcome of a definition

for what "a bottom-up origin" actually is ...

i offer the notion we might accept the context of:

governance - dialogue - politics - democracy (GDPD)

not arguing the simultaneousy of those 4 entities with

i - it - its - we (KenWilbers Quadrant of Perspectives)

(or if anyone does: feel free to initiate and guide the definition of GDPD)

If we indeed succeed in defining the bottom-up origin ...

the answer of how weaving this refinements in a 2007-jacket in the partakers of democracy minded minds

maybe more simple than the way to it did psycholize? collaborative understandings paving the way of authentic our generations here.

Feel free to refine my call,

s'ace

>
> Dear S'ace,
> you seem like missing the basic condition by which "the anyone
> speaking of (direct) democracy looks like a joke ..." . This basic
> condition is policies having or having not a bottom-up origin.
>
> But...  if the "emerging new standards (to be installed)" were really
> emerging bottom-up, instead of being top-down indoctrinated as it
> happens as by most post-IIWW children, then all of this mess of
> words on what democracy is, or it shall be, could finally end into
> a museum and we could begin to 'speak' of democracy by facts...
>
> Ciao,
> ant
>
>