[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]

00718: Re:[WDDM] Direct Democracy and Political Parties

From: s'ace <cjdegroot(at)orange.nl>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 21:27:39 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re:[WDDM] Direct Democracy and Political Parties

thanks for broadcasting the considerations, webmaster!
s' ace

nb.
optionally informing on http://integraldemocracy.blogspot.com/
on a mission to LuckNow weaving in Human Emergencies
"where the S'aints go merging in (&out:-)"


Datum: 04/11/06 09:43 AM
Van: "WDDM webmaster" <wbm@world-wide-democracy.net>
Aan: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
CC: democracy-europe(at)yahoogroups.com, "cicdd" <cicdd(at)yahoogroups.com>
Onderwerp : [WDDM] Direct Democracy and Political Parties

Our recent e-mail discussion on the possible role of political parties in the
promotion/achievement of DD can be found posted here:
http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/common/dd_parties.html
(with all repetitions of individual contributions removed).

Can we say that its highlights or conclusions are: ?

- The notion of a Direct Democracy political party is self-contradictory by
definition.

- A DD political party will have a hard time to live up to its principles.

- However it is claimed that in some jurisdictions it may be the only way to
achieve change.

- The most important/hardest thing to solve is how to convince the majority of
public that DD is a better system - how to show the public that it works.

- A DD party (movement) should be global.

Mirek





"t(h)ree self one fo(u)r alll alll fo(u)r one self t(h)ree"


[Prev] [Next]   [Index]   [Thread Index]