[Prev] [Next] [Index]
[Thread Index]
00632: Re: [WDDM] A proposal put for vote to all the WDDM members
From: |
"S'ace" <cjdegroot(at)wanadoo.nl> |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:31:34 +0200 |
Subject: |
Re: [WDDM] A proposal put for vote to all the WDDM members |
RULE A: Only the current Administrators
shall hold authority to create or amend the WDDM Operating Rules or
Constitution.
Note of
Awareness
when i made my choice to agree
...
i was and still am aware of the fact,
trusting my devoted webmasters, that apart from the verbs create / amend WE have
other verbs, such as dialoque, inform, remember, formulate, express etc. that
give me as a non-administrator member anough space and time to be with the core
and the field of US.
May the force Be & Be with You ...
rs,
S'ace
----- Original Message -----
To: <wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 5:06
PM
Subject: Re: [WDDM] A proposal put for
vote to all the WDDM members
> ACCEPT (YES vote)
>
> nb.
>
mirek,
> i see now what you meant lately by asking me to become active
...
> think i missed the crux ...
> maybe too much occupied by
another busyness ...
>
> nice to see the progress ..!
>
s'ace
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "WDDM
webmaster" <wbm@world-wide-democracy.net>
> To: <wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 11:24 PM
>
Subject: [WDDM] A proposal put for vote to all the WDDM members
>
>
>> Dear WDDM members!
>> A group of five "Active"
WDDM members have been having discussion in the
>> WDDM Forum about
how to move closer to the re-establishment of a
>> functioning WDDM.
You can find these discussions in the "Internal WDDM
>> Discussions
Folder" at
>> http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/forum/index.php?3, in the "WDDM
>> Membership Guidelines" forum.
We have come up with a proposal for the
>> "WDDM Membership Structure
and Rules", and we want to put this proposal to
>> the vote of all the
current WDDM members before we proceed further.
>> We
recommend that you read all the discussions in the "WDDM Membership
>>
Guidelines" forum, and possibly in other related forums in the "Internal
>> WDDM Discussions Folder" so that you can make an informed
decision.
>> The proposal is attached
below.
>> The vote on this proposal is a simple YES/NO
vote.
>> You can either ACCEPT (YES vote) or REJECT (NO
vote) this proposal.
>> The decision on this proposal will
be made on the basis of the majority
>> of all who have voted within 7
calendar days from now, i.e., by June 26,
>> 15:00 MST (or 17:00 EST,
or 21:00 GMT/UTC, or June 27, 6:00 Tokyo time).
>> To make
it easy for all the WDDM members, the vote on this proposal is
>> by
e-mail, send you votes in to wddm@world-wide-democracy.net (or simply
>> reply to this
e-mail).
>> Thank you,
>>
Mirek
>>
>> THE PROPOSAL that is the subject of this vote
(also posted at: ):
>>
>> Beginning of the
>>
proposal
----------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
WDDM Membership Structure and Rules
>>
===================================
>>
>>
SUMMARY:
>>
>> Our past experience shows that there are
roughly two groups who want to be
>> associated with
WDDM.
>>
>> 1. There is a larger group of people who support
WDDM goals (to various
>> extent) but are currently not able to
participate more actively. These
>> persons will be called the WDDM
Associate Members. They constitute a loose
>> Association without any
further internal structure. WDDM Associate
>> Membership is granted
without approval to all interested persons who
>> complete the
registration form at
>> http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/forum/register.php. However, their
>> membership can be terminated,
if their behaviour is in complete
>> contradiction to the WDDM
mission.
>>
>> 2. The second, smaller group consists of people
who are able and willing
>> to be active in the WDDM operations. They
will be called the
>> Administrators (or Operating Members, Active
Members, or Ordinary
>> Members - the exact name chosen may be the
subject of further discussion).
>> They can create whatever structure
(officers, Board) they deem necessary
>> for the efficient functioning
of WDDM. This group of Administrators can be
>> seen as the WDDM
proper - an Organization within the larger pool (or
>> association) of
associate members. Any Associate Member can apply to
>> become an
Administrator. Such applications are processed and approved by
>> all
current Administrators.
>>
>>
>> PROPOSED
RULES:
>>
>> RULE A: Only the current Administrators shall
hold authority to create or
>> amend the WDDM Operating Rules or
Constitution.
>>
>> RULE B: All members can make suggestions
relating to WDDM's operations,
>> but final decisions shall be made
only by a consensus of the
>> organization's
Administrators.
>>
>> RULE C: Any Administrator, who fails to
vote at official WDDM polls (for
>> more than five (5) times or more)
during a period of more than six (6)
>> months without an acceptable
reason submitted to the Operating Members
>> shall be relegated to
Associate Member status.
>>
>> RULE D: Any Administrator
member shall be relegated to Associate Member
>> status should 75
percent of the Administrators vote in favour of such a
>>
motion.
>>
>>
>> To become a WDDM (Associate) MEMBER:
an individual must complete the
>> application form found at
www.world-wide-democracy.net.
>>
>>
>> To become an
ADMINISTRATOR: a member shall have actively participated in
>> WDDM
discussions for no less than six (6) months and must complete the
>>
application form found at www.world-wide-democracy.net.
>>
>> End of the proposal
----------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
Attachment to the Proposal:
>>
>> The Administrator
application form will contain the fields for the
>> applicant's full
real name and mailing address, and the following
>> information on the
approval process:
>> 1. The Administrator Member Application is sent to
all the current
>> Administrator Members for review.
>> 2.
The Administrator Application Review will be completed within 90
days.
>> 3. An applicant will be immediately accepted as a WDDM
Administrator if
>> not more than 20% of the current Administrators
have any objections to
>> her/his Membership.
>> 4. An
applicant will be immediately rejected if 80% or more of the
>>
Administrators are against her/his Administrator Membership.
>> 5. If
none of 3. or 4. applies, the application is suspended until a
>>
consensus (either 3. or 4.) is achieved.
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
We are looking for your votes!
>>
>> The initial Active
Members/Administrators
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
[Prev] [Next] [Index]
[Thread Index]