Re: WDDM future

[Leopoldo Salgui <lsalgui(at)demopunk.net>]

This poll is a quite valuable initiative.

Indeed, I will participate submitting my opinion.

Leo

El Sunday, 18 de December de 2005 15:19, M. Kolar escribió:
> Hello everybody,
> It seems that there is time to try something new here in the WDDM because
> the experiment in self-organizing that I have started in April clearly
> failed.
>
> WDDM Wiki is apparently not used much and disliked by many. We are making
> steps to have a standard bulletin Board as an addition or replacement to
> Wiki.
>
> More importantly, we need finally some basic structure, and a decision
> making mechanism (not to make decisions for all the people in the world,
> but only for us internally, how to do our yet to be defined business, and
> how to define that business).
>
> To move things to the next stage, I want to poll all the members on their
> opinions on this. I prepared a first draft of the poll questions at this
> page: http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/HowToProceedPoll
> (and I will copy it at the end of this message).
> In the first stage I invite everybody to comment and help to make the final
> meaningful list of the questions. Then after Dec. 25, we'll proceed with
> answering these questions.
>
> I propose that those members who would not participate at all in this poll,
> lose the status of active members, and would be perhaps listed only as
> supporters/sympathizers. Otherwise nobody would be forced to answer all the
> questions, the keep the active member status, it would be enough to answer
> at least some of them (one or more?).
>
> Mirek
>
> -----------
> Here is the copy of the above HowToProceedPoll Wiki page:
>
> How To Proceed with WDDM Organizing?
>
> Dec. 18, 2005: This is proposal for conducting a poll among the WDDM
> members. Please feel free to comment on this proposal in any way (here in
> Wiki or in the WDDm mailing list), and add of modify proposed questions.
> Discussion of the wording of the poll questions will be closed on Dec. 25,
> and after that the questions will be submitted to all the members.
> They will have another week (10 days, 2 weeks???) to answer them.
>
> Proposed questions:
>
>     1. Why have you become a WDDM member?
>     2. What should WDDM try to achieve?
>     3. Does WDDM need a decision making mechanism (voting)?
>     4. Is there any point to wait any longer that any spontaneous progress
> (self-organization) will be made on issues that were moved to
> http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/AdjournedHistoricalTopics section?
>     5. Should instead a small group of active WDDM members formulate all
> the basic documents (Mission. Goals, Rules, Voting procedures)?
>     6. Do you want to be a part of the group?
>     7. Should the WDDM mailing list be fully moderated (any postings would
> have to be approved by one or two moderators to avoid tons of junk mail)?
>
>
>     1. Do you need interactive dynamical site?
>     2. Do you like/dislike WDDM Wiki?
>     3. How complicated is this Wiki to use?
>     4. Have you tried to read
> http://www.world-wide-democracy.net/Wiki/GettingStarted?
>     5. Should Wiki be replaced or supplemented by something else
> interactive? What?