The best way to ADMINISTRATE DD (was Re: E E - (W)DD - GBM explanation ...)

[Antonio Rossin <rossin(at)tin.it>]

Dear S'ace

Thanks for your "260 words" explanation.

I personally appreciate it very much and am looking forwards
to seeing it inserted to the WDDM web site as a DD tool for
improving DD people's awareness (self-consciousness) as
responsible sharers.

How to communicate to other WDDM fellows?  YOU could
simply post your 26O words to the WDDM mailing list, at:
<wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>
with a short presentation, such as: "just my "two-cents"
contribution to the "voting system" topic.

There is a little problem to be solved in advance, that is the
"function" of WDDM... service (m-list included) as a tool to
facilitate a Worldwide Direct Democracy communication.

There are two main interpretations of this WDDM (M-list)
function - at least, this is how I see things go, to date.

One is headed by Bruce, who wants to proceed DD things
by building up the utmost majority's consensus, and then vote
and decide "democratically" for the DD people.

The other is headed by antonio (myself) who thinks of
WDDM it must provide the DD people with an open

"parliament" where they can withdraw their opinion --

and vote accordingly if that was the case -- from the

dialectical confrontation ("challenge", in your terms) of

opposite opinions.

That is, opposite to Bruce, I'm pointing out to

"dialectically communicating" as the best way to

ADMINISTRATE Democracy.

This makes Bruce (and his likes) get furious, because he

understands my opinion challenging his opinion as a means

to rock  down the consensus he is building up, thereby he

charges me with "destroying everything" of  what he wants

to vote and decide democratically -- "for the people", he

claims;  "over the People", I guess.

Thus, as for the time being, be not in a hurry.  I'm preparing the

second half of my "Systems of Voting: there is a bug there?"

document and will make reference to your work therein, since

I find your approach very similar to mine.

In the meanwhile I wonder: do you receive posts from
<wddm@world-wide-democracy.net>? if so, you can share-in
to the dialogue, by simply using the button "reply" on your screen.

Ciao,  antonio









At 13:08 +0100 12-12-2005, S'ace wrote:
> hey antonio and bruce,
>
> i produced an explanation in 260 words (excl. context) ...
>
> on the subject as i understood the queest by the forum
> personalized by 2 other fellow human ... bruce and antonio ...
>
>
> i dont know how to communicate this technically with the
> other  fellow ...
>
> this regarding the several mails on the administration and
> mailinglist subject ...
>
>
> so you can hint me ... or even rather service me how to
> communicate my textures properly ...
>
>
>  i'll hear from you, both? independently2?
>
>
> have fun reading, which may accomplish meanings ...
>
> respectfully ...
>
> }{{ s'ace
>
>
>
> nb. the wordfile is my worksheet ... (allowing you both to look in
> my kitchen :-)
>
>
>
>Pre8ace
>
> Explaining the DD function

> <http://www.globalgeniusvoter.com/>

> presenting the GenerationBindingMatrix as a ModernPeoplesVoting

> System is intended to accomplish... I, S’ace, "dutch originating"

> earthling, or (W)DD-citizen as you prefer, promised to be back
> on a Monday as 1212 2005 gregorian calendar-numbered, as
> well as American as Europian noted... ;-), goes as it comes...
>
> I accomplished myself a bonus of 10 words while trading my
> contribution with Antonio, who presented himself as a kind
> fellow Europian/Worldcitizen mediating my conversation with
> Bruce on the subject... mentioned.
>
> This as a starter to set the energetic core for a play with words...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 260 words on DD-voting:
>
> Spending words in a Dutch way:
>
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=function gives me:
> "Something closely related to another thing and dependent
> on it for its existence, value, or significance: Growth is a
> function of nutrition"

>
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=intention gives us:
> "A course of action that one intends to follow"

>
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=accomplish gives:

> "To succeed in doing; bring to pass."
>
>
>
> Is DD-function a Form, a Service, a Challenge or an
> Accomplishment?
>
> Or is it the pretention of the DD-function to cover all of
> those Essential-entities?
>
>
> Let me sorcer through those 4 entities as an explanation...
> Do you go with me for a short while?
>
>
> Form
>
> Looking at the websitehomepage
> http://www.globalgeniusvoter.com/ we Will be able to see
> a different Graphical Image guided by the dimensions
> time and votingpower/participation.
>
>
>
> Service
>
> The GenerationBindingMatrix provides services to young
> people to participate as a voter and to learn to decide in
> contemplating how to relate with ones fellow citizen votees.
> This learning process will fruit their political strifes while
> being and living a life in togetherness. Older generations
> of people Could allow this service as their benefit too.
>
>
>
> Challenge
>
> Each citizen can choose to be Votee in stead of a Voter
> participating the democratic core. People Should allow
> each citizen to speak free without a sort of party-
> organisational approval of speech by challenging fellow
> citizen.
>
>
> Accomplishment
>
> As we understand the whole thing... we have to bring the
> pass... and have to is another way of saying we MUST
> accomplish our goal in our space and time of being...
>
>
> This must be about it sticking to 260 words, okay
> FellowCitizen?
>
>
>
> ;-)  S’ace