hi John, Bruce, Antonio, Mirek & et all
feeling involved in DD-essentials,
i would like to provide a brief presentation
of about 260 words
(this number i like more than 250 because 260
resonates with 13x20, which just correlates tith my GGvoter genes, eh ... DNA,
just a personal habit that may need no excuse? just being another you, another
citizen baby re-constitutionalizing ...)
i did not start yet, i'm just preparing the
soil before some seed has a real chance ...
agreed?
(monday ? or dont you like
mondays?)
Bruce, may i invite you to proceed with the
dialog on
?
or do you like me to slice it down to more
eatable chunks?
i really appreciate your opinion and
constructive arguments! which even may support my 260 words ...
;-)
have a nice day and some fun too when
building bridges ... we walk to...gether
s'ace
----- Original Message -----
To: wddm@world-wide-democracy.net
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 6:07
AM
Subject: Re: Epistemological
Evolution Did you understand the suffrage which S'ace's site
advocates? bruce
On 12/8/05, Antonio
Rossin wrote:
Hi
John -- and S'ace, and Mirek
I would not see anything complicated,
here.
Let S'ace provide a brief presentation (say, about 250
words) of his site explaining the DD function it is intended to
accomplish;
Let Mirek link the site in a dedicated page of our WDDM
web site together with other sites addressing a similar function;
Let local democratic communities (if any) adopt S'ace's
proposal if they wish, in a wide comparison with other sites addressing
the same democratic function.
(Let our WDDM web-site become a
function-oriented DD device)
What more else?
OTOH, any trick
aimed "to impose" any political system onto the people would lead IMHO to
a tricked democracy, i.e. a top-down driven one, something else but the
bottom-up driven, direct democracy we are looking
for.
Regards, antonio
At 16:20 -0500 8-12-2005,
John Baker wrote: > It looks complicated. Not that that's a
bad thing. But how would > you propose to impose such a
system? > >----- Original Message ----- >From: S'ace >To:
<wddm@world-wide-democracy.net> >Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 12:23 PM >Subject:
Re: Epistemological Evolution > > > > george
& john (et all) may be so privileged to invite you to
... > > www.globalgeniusvoter.com
... > > which is a site i build ... in noospheric state
of mind (i admit) ... > > > > i just
invite you to say something on the image of the home-page
... > > what message enters your '(state of) mind? > > > > maybe as a starter (or what
you decide) for contextual refining > > debates? or as a
meditation for even more profound
energies? > > > > thanks for your
few seconds ... spent > >
s'ace > > > > dont be shy to ask
questions or problemize ...
please? > >
-- Direct Democracy League, DDL is a nonpartisan coalition,
advocating constitutional renewal at state and national levels to give us TRG
-- true republican governance. Not mob-rule, it is a balanced governance of
I&R's citizen lawmaking combined with representative govt. TRG relies on
the People to make decisions using State-level OCI's (online
citizen institutions). OCI's will be transparent organizing institutions, not
control devices.TRG has been legally recognized as a republican
form of government intrinsic to the Constitution. http://trg-polity.org
Bruce Eggum
Gresham Wisconsin, USA http://doinggovernment.com/ Check
out my Blog too http://doinggovernment.blogspot.com/
|